"niko4;c-2047191" wrote:
All I'm saying is that most people who are sitting in the top 50 in their shard would find it incredibly difficult to maintain that in my shard.
#1 & 4 are relevant to show the competitiveness and strength of people in my shard.
I disagree. It's one of many day 1 fleet shards. Total GP and amount of non-pilot journey characters is irrelevant for the fleet shard.
It doesn't look like you have GAS and are only sit at under 5.1M so comparing your roster you would be ranked near the bottom of my top 50 and yet you comfortably sit in top 50 regularly with little effort (under 1900 wins for you)
As I also replied to you, when you contacted me in a PM:
Stop making your false assumptions based on those stats. Continuing makes you look silly.
Don't dismiss Ackbar as it's still a great fleet when you have bistan and a lot of beefy toons. I only laugh because of the people in my shard have relic bistan crew which is just crazy to me
What's your point?
And as far as my rank, I don't bother to be competitive as I mentioned because it's crazy up there. However, if you dropped to 300 in your shard, I'd love to see if anyone is close to what I see at those ranks.
How are 5* and 6* Negotiators at rank 300 relevant?
"Didn't check thoroughly" - maybe you should before you jump to conclusions.
Not going to happen. And how would you even do that? Without making false assumptions like you have a tendency to do?
My point is that disregarding whether your shard or mine is more active, based on the data you provided it appears that the top-50 fleets on my shard are stronger in general than the top-50 fleets of your shard.
Capital Games Team
