"niko4;c-2111638" wrote:
@Gifafi Sorry the original post is pretty old so those stats are out-dated. All 7* Kenobis and has been for awhile
Yet, even back then in January there were other shards with stronger fleets in top-50 than on your shard according to your OP. Your shard is not extraordinary in that regard.
"niko4;c-2111638" wrote:
And welcome back @Waqui - glad you have time to bring back your criticism with your hunches. If you recall from above, l had a few others from my shard or the other half agree with me.
If you recall from above, I had a few other posters agree with me.
The other half? What other half? That one fleet arena shard was not split in 2 halves. Some players were moved and distributed to a number of other already existing shards.
"niko4;c-2111638" wrote:
Sadly, Ravenclaws has left the game since. I also see you have still been enjoying top 50 (for the most part) in your arena with your R4 Ani and G12 Fives . . . Oh and with only 2200 fleet wins. . . Bring some hard facts next time if you think yours is stronger. Here's a quick update on my top 50 as of today - Every Kenobi team has R7 Ani and relic Fives. Approx. 6200 fleet wins.
A. I'm not the one complaining here - you are.
B. If you recall from above my number of fleet arena wins is far below average in top-50 of my shard.
C. None of the above changes the fact that you had a weak fleet back in january, yet complained about being unable to reach high ranks.
D. Comparing total number of wins is misleading. You need to compare number of wins since the "split" of your shard if you want to describe the activity on your shard with others.
"niko4;c-2111638" wrote:
I'm only posting this to get CGs attention due to the considerable amount of crystals and zetas our members have lost due to the crippling competition that is not normal compared to most other shards.
You didn't lose anything. You slacked big time building your fleet. Back in january you wouldn't have made it into top-50 on my shard either.
"niko4;c-2111638" wrote:
If other fleet shards are close to mine,...
Some are.
"niko4;c-2111638" wrote:
there is still too much of a disparity and some of those should probably be adjusted as well.
I disagree. That wouldn't be fair to the players in the shards that would receive players from my shard.
"niko4;c-2111638" wrote:
As a guild recruiter and devoted player, I have seen tons of people in simple shards: they don't need to fight much, gear up a ton, and have a similar player profile to myself yet they can enjoy top 20 with ease. CG has already acknowledged the issue once so you could imagine what a problem it was before the migration. Obviously, they didn't do enough.
They brought your shard down to the level of other early shards, judged by your OP. Yes there are other easier shards, but yours is not extraordinary any more.
