"DarjeloSalas;c-2312830" wrote:
"Herodis4;c-2312825" wrote:
I would argue that DoTs are a far more accessible feat as there are a multitude of factions and champions that inflict them. As for the thermals it's either Jawas, or a handful of Bountyhunters. I get it - BHs are the new thing, the whole conquest is BH themed but is it really necessary for every game mode to evolve around a certain faction?
We just had a Thermal Challenge 2 weeks ago.
Galactic Challenges are designed to reward roster depth and/or theory crafting to achieve certain feats.
Those with wide rosters will red crate all (or almost all) challenges. Those with narrow rosters won't.
There's 2 of them every week, so over the long haul you still get a heap of material for free from them.
I do understand the principle of those challenges and the idea of roster depth. I would not consider my roster narrow either, I'm lacking certain factions to some degree yes, but you are missing my point I guess. I would not say that a feat that is limiting you to a handful of champs (Dengar, Zam, Greedo, Jawas) is considered "theory crafting".
If the theme for a challenge is First Order, why would I assume that I additionally need a very specific set of champs that also are shoved down our throat for Conquest. If you haven't geared them up for Conquest and can get better rewards there, at least give the people a break and let them get creative in the challenges.
Additionally I'm wondering about your definition of "free" stuff. If you consider the rewards you get from the challenges free, then per definition also the stuff from TB, TW and Raids is considered free and that I would say is not the case. Free stuff is the stuff you get just for logging in and don't have to do anything for in my book.
