Liquidious fleshbags that we are, Revan has reappeared in the Light Side Territory Battle Platoons before he is intended to. We will be addressing this with a reward after the holiday and apologize once again for our human frailty.So this is a bug fix of revan in platoons but what I want you to focus on is the first and last part with Liquidious fleshbags, typically used by HK-47 to insult human or generelly living beings and human frailty makes emphasis on the fact that again, droids are superior, it might even come as soon as the holiday rewards role out?Also in the abilities feature we saw a pose change for HK so a rework is imminent for sure.

Meatbags is the term used, but yes, lets get a hk rework

And let's get him a synergy with Revan. Anakin built C3PO, but Revan built a personal bodyguard/killing maching.

Unpopular opinion, but I'm going to guess this is just a phrase the dev likes that HK uses, rather than an indication of a rework. But eh, would be cool.

I wouldn’t read too much into it. It’s like Crumb asking about thrash compactors.

Sure, it may be a coincidence, but they are also updating HK-47’s stance he has in battle, which further supports an HK rework.

This just simply confirms a hk47 rework

RimmerJA
7 years ago
"Query: This "meatbag" is an incoherent babble of useless information. Can I shoot him?"
irish570team
New Spectator
7 years ago
If no GG rework, then HK definitely does not deserve his own.
Badalex48
7 years ago
"IronCross;c-1703416" wrote:
If no GG rework, then HK definitely does not deserve his own.

Just because GG hasn’t been reworked yet does not mean that HK won’t. They are on KOTOR right now, and we also have characters no one heard of before like Starck when we are still missing big players like Jedi Luke or Snoke.
CadoaBane
7 years ago
"IronCross;c-1703416" wrote:
If no GG rework, then HK definitely does not deserve his own.
HK-47 was much more than just Revan's side kick. He killed Jedi, Sith and various other bounty targets on his own. If I remember correctly, he even got rid of one of his previous "owners" before meeting again with Revan. Of course he deserves a good rework. What does it have to do with Grievous who is from a completely different era? You can't compare such characters.
Drazhar91
7 years ago
I wouldn't take a sarcastic/hysterical/stressed post as a hint.
scuba75
Seasoned Rookie
7 years ago
"FidelisAnimi;c-1701780" wrote:
Unpopular opinion, but I'm going to guess this is just a phrase the dev likes that HK uses, rather than an indication of a rework. But eh, would be cool.

agree, and you know it was about revan.
But hey this is the intetwebs so sure let's make crazy assumptions.
kshark555
7 years ago
Can they just remove a character from your inventory and then re-release him as a Marquee? Because that’s what they want to do right now. Re-works don’t increase revenue.
Boba_The_Fetter
7 years ago
They're game developers for a star wars game, it's only logical that they will use words and phrases from star wars. Of course it means nothing
NyKynoe
7 years ago
"kshark;c-1701816" wrote:
Can they just remove a character from your inventory and then re-release him as a Marquee? Because that’s what they want to do right now. Re-works don’t increase revenue.

Reworks tend to follow underutilized factions, cause an increase in focus on under geared and levels toons. So I'm sure they do fine.
Vaderizer
Seasoned Newcomer
7 years ago
That doesn't confirm anything. I'm not sure people on this forum know what the word "confirm" actually means.