Wat/Hoda/3PO GAC issue?

"Jack1210;c-2042511" wrote:

"AvatarofCynicism;c-2042199" wrote:

"Daerovius;c-2042174" wrote:

"Gifafi;c-2042140" wrote:

"Daerovius;c-2042137" wrote:
Quite dumb from CG, and a real **** move from the one who put them on defense... Those are the ones who should get a ban

why?

Because it gets other people banned? And setting something that get people banned IS quite a **** move...

It is entirely possible that whoever set the team just wanted to see what would happen. I don't think we've had a situation like this before were a team auto-retreats and someone gets banned.

There's this cool mode called galactic war for testing like that. It is hard to say this was not a malicious move by the guy who placed them on D.

So there's an in-game message that tells everyone who plays that if a team auto-retreats on defense in GAC, the attacking player gets insta-banned? Or there's a well publicized thread or reddit post about someone being insta-banned for the same thing? Please, point me to them. Otherwise, how would anyone know what would happen? Prove malicious intent.

"AvatarofCynicism;c-2042514" wrote:

"Jack1210;c-2042511" wrote:

"AvatarofCynicism;c-2042199" wrote:

"Daerovius;c-2042174" wrote:

"Gifafi;c-2042140" wrote:

"Daerovius;c-2042137" wrote:
Quite dumb from CG, and a real **** move from the one who put them on defense... Those are the ones who should get a ban

why?

Because it gets other people banned? And setting something that get people banned IS quite a **** move...

It is entirely possible that whoever set the team just wanted to see what would happen. I don't think we've had a situation like this before were a team auto-retreats and someone gets banned.

There's this cool mode called galactic war for testing like that. It is hard to say this was not a malicious move by the guy who placed them on D.

So there's an in-game message that tells everyone who plays that if a team auto-retreats on defense in GAC, the attacking player gets insta-banned? Or there's a well publicized thread or reddit post about someone being insta-banned for the same thing? Please, point me to them. Otherwise, how would anyone know what would happen? Prove malicious intent.

How would anyone know? I literally told you, galactic war. Take a step back and logically look at it. Why would you place 3 toons on defense that you know immediately retreat without testing it out? See what happens? Well GW would give you an instant answer, so its not curiosity. Collusion? Unlikely, since the detailed post on reddit about this made it clear the attacker was surprised by the placement. Just to mess with the opponent? Seems most likely, especially since people seem to think auto-D or purposely setting one team is funny and somehow hurts CG and not the opponent. Prove anything but malicious intent

"Jack1210;c-2042524" wrote:

"AvatarofCynicism;c-2042514" wrote:

"Jack1210;c-2042511" wrote:

"AvatarofCynicism;c-2042199" wrote:

"Daerovius;c-2042174" wrote:

"Gifafi;c-2042140" wrote:

"Daerovius;c-2042137" wrote:
Quite dumb from CG, and a real **** move from the one who put them on defense... Those are the ones who should get a ban

why?

Because it gets other people banned? And setting something that get people banned IS quite a **** move...

It is entirely possible that whoever set the team just wanted to see what would happen. I don't think we've had a situation like this before were a team auto-retreats and someone gets banned.

There's this cool mode called galactic war for testing like that. It is hard to say this was not a malicious move by the guy who placed them on D.

So there's an in-game message that tells everyone who plays that if a team auto-retreats on defense in GAC, the attacking player gets insta-banned? Or there's a well publicized thread or reddit post about someone being insta-banned for the same thing? Please, point me to them. Otherwise, how would anyone know what would happen? Prove malicious intent.

How would anyone know? I literally told you, galactic war. Take a step back and logically look at it. Why would you place 3 toons on defense that you know immediately retreat without testing it out? See what happens? Well GW would give you an instant answer, so its not curiosity. Collusion? Unlikely, since the detailed post on reddit about this made it clear the attacker was surprised by the placement. Just to mess with the opponent? Seems most likely, especially since people seem to think auto-D or purposely setting one team is funny and somehow hurts CG and not the opponent. Prove anything but malicious intent

Reasonable doubt for "anything but malicious intent":
The player who set the team on defense didn't test it because they assumed it would not auto-retreat, thinking it would require his opponent to waste a team on a trio that would struggle to win, but would apply enough dots to steal some banners.

there you go, that is just one situation where the player who posted the team is not trying to be malicious. There is also the situation where the player posting the def wanted their opponent to just go in thinking everyone wouldn't run away, thus wasting more than 1 character on a free win. Point is, sometimes GAC comes down to a few banners here and there, so any little thing you can do to steal a few banners is smart.

So next time I'm in a matchup where I am severly disadvantaged I'll just set these three and no one else. Instawin!! Take that, 350K GP more than me person!

"Jack1210;c-2042524" wrote:

"AvatarofCynicism;c-2042514" wrote:

"Jack1210;c-2042511" wrote:

"AvatarofCynicism;c-2042199" wrote:

"Daerovius;c-2042174" wrote:

"Gifafi;c-2042140" wrote:

"Daerovius;c-2042137" wrote:
Quite dumb from CG, and a real **** move from the one who put them on defense... Those are the ones who should get a ban

why?

Because it gets other people banned? And setting something that get people banned IS quite a **** move...

It is entirely possible that whoever set the team just wanted to see what would happen. I don't think we've had a situation like this before were a team auto-retreats and someone gets banned.

There's this cool mode called galactic war for testing like that. It is hard to say this was not a malicious move by the guy who placed them on D.

So there's an in-game message that tells everyone who plays that if a team auto-retreats on defense in GAC, the attacking player gets insta-banned? Or there's a well publicized thread or reddit post about someone being insta-banned for the same thing? Please, point me to them. Otherwise, how would anyone know what would happen? Prove malicious intent.

How would anyone know? I literally told you, galactic war. Take a step back and logically look at it. Why would you place 3 toons on defense that you know immediately retreat without testing it out? See what happens? Well GW would give you an instant answer, so its not curiosity. Collusion? Unlikely, since the detailed post on reddit about this made it clear the attacker was surprised by the placement. Just to mess with the opponent? Seems most likely, especially since people seem to think auto-D or purposely setting one team is funny and somehow hurts CG and not the opponent. Prove anything but malicious intent

So you ignore the actual point of my question, which is about being insta-banned for beating that team in GAC, and instead just rehash what you've already said. And then you somehow bring it back to being malicious, even though there can't be anything malicious involved without knowing an insta-ban is a definite outcome. OK.

"Jack1210;c-2042524" wrote:

"AvatarofCynicism;c-2042514" wrote:

"Jack1210;c-2042511" wrote:

"AvatarofCynicism;c-2042199" wrote:

"Daerovius;c-2042174" wrote:

"Gifafi;c-2042140" wrote:

"Daerovius;c-2042137" wrote:
Quite dumb from CG, and a real **** move from the one who put them on defense... Those are the ones who should get a ban

why?

Because it gets other people banned? And setting something that get people banned IS quite a **** move...

It is entirely possible that whoever set the team just wanted to see what would happen. I don't think we've had a situation like this before were a team auto-retreats and someone gets banned.

There's this cool mode called galactic war for testing like that. It is hard to say this was not a malicious move by the guy who placed them on D.

So there's an in-game message that tells everyone who plays that if a team auto-retreats on defense in GAC, the attacking player gets insta-banned? Or there's a well publicized thread or reddit post about someone being insta-banned for the same thing? Please, point me to them. Otherwise, how would anyone know what would happen? Prove malicious intent.

How would anyone know? I literally told you, galactic war. Take a step back and logically look at it. Why would you place 3 toons on defense that you know immediately retreat without testing it out? See what happens? Well GW would give you an instant answer, so its not curiosity. Collusion? Unlikely, since the detailed post on reddit about this made it clear the attacker was surprised by the placement. Just to mess with the opponent? Seems most likely, especially since people seem to think auto-D or purposely setting one team is funny and somehow hurts CG and not the opponent. Prove anything but malicious intent

I could reasonably see people taken by surprise with this team and then trying to throw in a powerful team not knowing any better.

"AvatarofCynicism;c-2042533" wrote:

"Jack1210;c-2042524" wrote:

"AvatarofCynicism;c-2042514" wrote:

"Jack1210;c-2042511" wrote:

"AvatarofCynicism;c-2042199" wrote:

"Daerovius;c-2042174" wrote:

"Gifafi;c-2042140" wrote:

"Daerovius;c-2042137" wrote:
Quite dumb from CG, and a real **** move from the one who put them on defense... Those are the ones who should get a ban

why?

Because it gets other people banned? And setting something that get people banned IS quite a **** move...

It is entirely possible that whoever set the team just wanted to see what would happen. I don't think we've had a situation like this before were a team auto-retreats and someone gets banned.

There's this cool mode called galactic war for testing like that. It is hard to say this was not a malicious move by the guy who placed them on D.

So there's an in-game message that tells everyone who plays that if a team auto-retreats on defense in GAC, the attacking player gets insta-banned? Or there's a well publicized thread or reddit post about someone being insta-banned for the same thing? Please, point me to them. Otherwise, how would anyone know what would happen? Prove malicious intent.

How would anyone know? I literally told you, galactic war. Take a step back and logically look at it. Why would you place 3 toons on defense that you know immediately retreat without testing it out? See what happens? Well GW would give you an instant answer, so its not curiosity. Collusion? Unlikely, since the detailed post on reddit about this made it clear the attacker was surprised by the placement. Just to mess with the opponent? Seems most likely, especially since people seem to think auto-D or purposely setting one team is funny and somehow hurts CG and not the opponent. Prove anything but malicious intent

So you ignore the actual point of my question, which is about being insta-banned for beating that team in GAC, and instead just rehash what you've already said. And then you somehow bring it back to being malicious, even though there can't be anything malicious involved without knowing an insta-ban is a definite outcome. OK.

Kinda how you ignored what I said about GW being a tester? Ya that's annoying. Again, some of the above scenarios are possible, but that requires some thought. You would think something as well thought out as your proposed scenario would include a battle attempt somewhere. Simmed galactic war already? Good thing these plenty of nodes to test this since opponent quality is irrelevant.

"Jack1210;c-2042567" wrote:

"AvatarofCynicism;c-2042533" wrote:

"Jack1210;c-2042524" wrote:

"AvatarofCynicism;c-2042514" wrote:

"Jack1210;c-2042511" wrote:

"AvatarofCynicism;c-2042199" wrote:

"Daerovius;c-2042174" wrote:

"Gifafi;c-2042140" wrote:

"Daerovius;c-2042137" wrote:
Quite dumb from CG, and a real **** move from the one who put them on defense... Those are the ones who should get a ban

why?

Because it gets other people banned? And setting something that get people banned IS quite a **** move...

It is entirely possible that whoever set the team just wanted to see what would happen. I don't think we've had a situation like this before were a team auto-retreats and someone gets banned.

There's this cool mode called galactic war for testing like that. It is hard to say this was not a malicious move by the guy who placed them on D.

So there's an in-game message that tells everyone who plays that if a team auto-retreats on defense in GAC, the attacking player gets insta-banned? Or there's a well publicized thread or reddit post about someone being insta-banned for the same thing? Please, point me to them. Otherwise, how would anyone know what would happen? Prove malicious intent.

How would anyone know? I literally told you, galactic war. Take a step back and logically look at it. Why would you place 3 toons on defense that you know immediately retreat without testing it out? See what happens? Well GW would give you an instant answer, so its not curiosity. Collusion? Unlikely, since the detailed post on reddit about this made it clear the attacker was surprised by the placement. Just to mess with the opponent? Seems most likely, especially since people seem to think auto-D or purposely setting one team is funny and somehow hurts CG and not the opponent. Prove anything but malicious intent

So you ignore the actual point of my question, which is about being insta-banned for beating that team in GAC, and instead just rehash what you've already said. And then you somehow bring it back to being malicious, even though there can't be anything malicious involved without knowing an insta-ban is a definite outcome. OK.

Kinda how you ignored what I said about GW being a tester? Ya that's annoying. Again, some of the above scenarios are possible, but that requires some thought. You would think something as well thought out as your proposed scenario would include a battle attempt somewhere. Simmed galactic war already? Good thing these plenty of nodes to test this since opponent quality is irrelevant.

I didn't ignore your "GW scenario"; it's just irrelevant to being "malicious". You still haven't answered how setting that team on D is malicious since we've never had a report of someone being auto banned for winning a battle in suspicious fashion.

But keep pretending like you have a defensible opinion on it if it helps you sleep at night. Or should we just agree that you're maliciously trolling since you know you're wrong?

"AvatarofCynicism;c-2042569" wrote:

"Jack1210;c-2042567" wrote:

"AvatarofCynicism;c-2042533" wrote:

"Jack1210;c-2042524" wrote:

"AvatarofCynicism;c-2042514" wrote:

"Jack1210;c-2042511" wrote:

"AvatarofCynicism;c-2042199" wrote:

"Daerovius;c-2042174" wrote:

"Gifafi;c-2042140" wrote:

"Daerovius;c-2042137" wrote:
Quite dumb from CG, and a real **** move from the one who put them on defense... Those are the ones who should get a ban

why?

Because it gets other people banned? And setting something that get people banned IS quite a **** move...

It is entirely possible that whoever set the team just wanted to see what would happen. I don't think we've had a situation like this before were a team auto-retreats and someone gets banned.

There's this cool mode called galactic war for testing like that. It is hard to say this was not a malicious move by the guy who placed them on D.

So there's an in-game message that tells everyone who plays that if a team auto-retreats on defense in GAC, the attacking player gets insta-banned? Or there's a well publicized thread or reddit post about someone being insta-banned for the same thing? Please, point me to them. Otherwise, how would anyone know what would happen? Prove malicious intent.

How would anyone know? I literally told you, galactic war. Take a step back and logically look at it. Why would you place 3 toons on defense that you know immediately retreat without testing it out? See what happens? Well GW would give you an instant answer, so its not curiosity. Collusion? Unlikely, since the detailed post on reddit about this made it clear the attacker was surprised by the placement. Just to mess with the opponent? Seems most likely, especially since people seem to think auto-D or purposely setting one team is funny and somehow hurts CG and not the opponent. Prove anything but malicious intent

So you ignore the actual point of my question, which is about being insta-banned for beating that team in GAC, and instead just rehash what you've already said. And then you somehow bring it back to being malicious, even though there can't be anything malicious involved without knowing an insta-ban is a definite outcome. OK.

Kinda how you ignored what I said about GW being a tester? Ya that's annoying. Again, some of the above scenarios are possible, but that requires some thought. You would think something as well thought out as your proposed scenario would include a battle attempt somewhere. Simmed galactic war already? Good thing these plenty of nodes to test this since opponent quality is irrelevant.

I didn't ignore your "GW scenario"; it's just irrelevant to being "malicious". You still haven't answered how setting that team on D is malicious since we've never had a report of someone being auto banned for winning a battle in suspicious fashion.

But keep pretending like you have a defensible opinion on it if it helps you sleep at night. Or should we just agree that you're maliciously trolling since you know you're wrong?

As if your name wasn't enough..... It is relevant. Someone who was curious what would happen has all the opportunity to find out.

"Jack1210;c-2042570" wrote:

"AvatarofCynicism;c-2042569" wrote:

"Jack1210;c-2042567" wrote:

"AvatarofCynicism;c-2042533" wrote:

"Jack1210;c-2042524" wrote:

"AvatarofCynicism;c-2042514" wrote:

"Jack1210;c-2042511" wrote:

"AvatarofCynicism;c-2042199" wrote:

"Daerovius;c-2042174" wrote:

"Gifafi;c-2042140" wrote:

"Daerovius;c-2042137" wrote:
Quite dumb from CG, and a real **** move from the one who put them on defense... Those are the ones who should get a ban

why?

Because it gets other people banned? And setting something that get people banned IS quite a **** move...

It is entirely possible that whoever set the team just wanted to see what would happen. I don't think we've had a situation like this before were a team auto-retreats and someone gets banned.

There's this cool mode called galactic war for testing like that. It is hard to say this was not a malicious move by the guy who placed them on D.

So there's an in-game message that tells everyone who plays that if a team auto-retreats on defense in GAC, the attacking player gets insta-banned? Or there's a well publicized thread or reddit post about someone being insta-banned for the same thing? Please, point me to them. Otherwise, how would anyone know what would happen? Prove malicious intent.

How would anyone know? I literally told you, galactic war. Take a step back and logically look at it. Why would you place 3 toons on defense that you know immediately retreat without testing it out? See what happens? Well GW would give you an instant answer, so its not curiosity. Collusion? Unlikely, since the detailed post on reddit about this made it clear the attacker was surprised by the placement. Just to mess with the opponent? Seems most likely, especially since people seem to think auto-D or purposely setting one team is funny and somehow hurts CG and not the opponent. Prove anything but malicious intent

So you ignore the actual point of my question, which is about being insta-banned for beating that team in GAC, and instead just rehash what you've already said. And then you somehow bring it back to being malicious, even though there can't be anything malicious involved without knowing an insta-ban is a definite outcome. OK.

Kinda how you ignored what I said about GW being a tester? Ya that's annoying. Again, some of the above scenarios are possible, but that requires some thought. You would think something as well thought out as your proposed scenario would include a battle attempt somewhere. Simmed galactic war already? Good thing these plenty of nodes to test this since opponent quality is irrelevant.

I didn't ignore your "GW scenario"; it's just irrelevant to being "malicious". You still haven't answered how setting that team on D is malicious since we've never had a report of someone being auto banned for winning a battle in suspicious fashion.

But keep pretending like you have a defensible opinion on it if it helps you sleep at night. Or should we just agree that you're maliciously trolling since you know you're wrong?

As if your name wasn't enough..... It is relevant. Someone who was curious what would happen has all the opportunity to find out.

Not being curious =/= Being malicious

that is the point you are missing here. There is no proof at this time that the opponent set a team with malicious intent.