Seriously? It use to be that getting 3 stars on a level or an event would give you the ability to sim the event. But more and more we are losing the option to sim events after we achieve 3 stars. Even old events still lack the ability to be simmed, events that have been in this game since before I started playing, which was just before the 1 year anniversary. There is just so much stuff to do in this game now, that there is no reason why we cannot be given the option to sim any event once we achieve 3 stars.

Yes we need the option to sim those. It's useless to go into a mission and just press the auto button.

A bunch of us wished and wished that the assault battles could be simmed for years.....and the price we paid for that wish was conquest. Be careful what you wish for.That being said, I do see the point the OP is making. Same one we kept making with the ABs.

What does AB simming have to do with conquest

"LendersQuiz;c-2410702" wrote:A bunch of us wished and wished that the assault battles could be simmed for years.....and the price we paid for that wish was conquest. Be careful what you wish .We made out great then! Conquest is the best. You get to use a lot of your roster and you get a great character or ship for minimal crystals. Let’s keep wishing!!

Conquest 7 is when CG made major changes to conquest, making it longer and more "grindy".While the time needed to complete Conquest will increase, we also want to begin to offset this by reducing the time commitment in other parts of the game. As part of the update with Conquest 7, we will be making all Assault Battles simmable if you have reached 3 Stars and in the future, we are looking to make Heroic Sith Triumvirate Raid simmable if you have reached certain requirements.Looks like CG has also since changed their mind on simming the Sith raid....

What is the point of stars ??? | EA Forums

18 Replies

KellinDrexel
Seasoned Vanguard
3 years ago
Yes we need the option to sim those. It's useless to go into a mission and just press the auto button.
adamja
Seasoned Ace
3 years ago
"Badger_made_me_do_it;c-2410689" wrote:
A, both battles take under 1 minute, dont be lazy.
B, simply no, more and more events have the sim option now.

no, not enough battles have sim options
LendersQuiz
Seasoned Ace
3 years ago
A bunch of us wished and wished that the assault battles could be simmed for years.....and the price we paid for that wish was conquest. Be careful what you wish for.

That being said, I do see the point the OP is making. Same one we kept making with the ABs.
tvsfrink
3 years ago
What does AB simming have to do with conquest
martinarvi776
3 years ago
"TVF;c-2410703" wrote:
What does AB simming have to do with conquest

My guess would be: Coexistance on opposite sides of the timesaving continuuum.
tvsfrink
3 years ago
"Profit;c-2410704" wrote:
"TVF;c-2410703" wrote:
What does AB simming have to do with conquest

My guess would be: Coexistance on opposite sides of the timesaving continuuum.

I'd like to see the timeline on that.
martinarvi776
3 years ago
"TVF;c-2410705" wrote:
"Profit;c-2410704" wrote:
"TVF;c-2410703" wrote:
What does AB simming have to do with conquest

My guess would be: Coexistance on opposite sides of the timesaving continuuum.

I'd like to see the timeline on that.

I don't know anything about the timelines or the intent of cg for that matter. I just Interpreted the poster to mean that they introduced a time saving mechanic with one hand and a (bigger)time sink with the other.
tvsfrink
3 years ago
"Profit;c-2410707" wrote:
"TVF;c-2410705" wrote:
"Profit;c-2410704" wrote:
"TVF;c-2410703" wrote:
What does AB simming have to do with conquest

My guess would be: Coexistance on opposite sides of the timesaving continuuum.

I'd like to see the timeline on that.

I don't know anything about the timelines or the intent of cg for that matter. I just Interpreted the poster to mean that they introduced a time saving mechanic with one hand and a (bigger)time sink with the other.

Yes I know. My comment was addressed to them not you, sorry.
martinarvi776
3 years ago
"TVF;c-2410708" wrote:
"Profit;c-2410707" wrote:
"TVF;c-2410705" wrote:
"Profit;c-2410704" wrote:
"TVF;c-2410703" wrote:
What does AB simming have to do with conquest

My guess would be: Coexistance on opposite sides of the timesaving continuuum.

I'd like to see the timeline on that.

I don't know anything about the timelines or the intent of cg for that matter. I just Interpreted the poster to mean that they introduced a time saving mechanic with one hand and a (bigger)time sink with the other.

Yes I know. My comment was addressed to them not you, sorry.

No harm no foul, or whichever proverb makes sense :)
LordDirt
Seasoned Ace
3 years ago
"LendersQuiz;c-2410702" wrote:
A bunch of us wished and wished that the assault battles could be simmed for years.....and the price we paid for that wish was conquest. Be careful what you wish .

We made out great then! Conquest is the best. You get to use a lot of your roster and you get a great character or ship for minimal crystals. Let’s keep wishing!!