Why such a focus on PVP?
This is an honest question. PvP in “turned based” games seems inherently flawed to me.. as it heavily depends on who goes first. And yes, I know there is pve in this game.. but it’s pretty weak. It ...
Forum Discussion
"Zippy_3000;d-209055" wrote:
This is an honest question. PvP in “turned based” games seems inherently flawed to me.. as it heavily depends on who goes first.
And yes, I know there is pve in this game.. but it’s pretty weak. It seems like there’s a lot of room for expansion/improvement here. Where’s the creativity? Also: please enlighten me- was the majority of the community really asking for all this grand arena crap? Look at what a sh!tstorm it’s been causing..
There's a lot of PvE in this game, though. Five full boards--eight if you count hard separate from normal--events every day, three different territory battle maps, every raid. PvP is just arena, fleet arena, territory wars (of which there's one, it's now always the same, and is boring af), and grand arena.
Who cares if the majority of the community was asking for something? This community is bad. The majority of requests by the majority of the community can be summed up as "I want free stuff and I want to win every time I do something." Grand Arena could be absolutely perfect, and you would still get a thousand complaints from entitled sore losers who are convinced they should have gone 3-0 every time, but "the game" cost them the championship.
