@puzzlezaddict wrote:
@DanishLighthouse incidentally, it has higher quality hardware in every category you've listed, plus a premium CPU cooler and PSU as well.
I were not going to write anything about that because the OP had already bought the PC and I saw no reason to bother anyone questioning you in hindsight but since you are acting somewhat far too sure of yourself and in the same manner want to whip other people to not have another opinion then I would like to state - just for the record - that you are complete wrong !
The AMD processor is inferior to the Intel processor . AMD is well known to give you very much 'bang for your bucks' for 'gaming PCs' but is inferior to Intel in 'over all' computing. Yes ! , the OP wants a 'gaming PC' but still my suggestion is better than yours with respect to the processor. Also to compare the 8 core suggested by me to the 8 core suggested by you (since comparing the 6 core to the 8 core is wrong) : https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-9700K-vs-AMD-Ryzen-7-3800X/4030vs4047
Also , I found this with some game bench marks (please notice conclusion at page bottom) : https://pcper.com/2019/07/amd-ryzen-7-3700x-ryzen-9-3900x-review/
Same way with the 'secondary hard drive , with the drives using the technology in question then there really is not anything better in 'consumer class' desktop drives than the Western Digital (Caviar) Black series and it is no coincidence that WD offers a 5-Year Limited Warranty on the drive series , ref. : https://shop.westerndigital.com/products/internal-drives/wd-black-desktop-sata-hdd
Anyway , I have responded in kind , but I see no use of further discussion as that would only bother the OP who as you point out has already bought the PC so further discussion would be futile and bring the OP no joy and for that reason I will not respond again here even if you insist on persevering.
Please have a very nice day everyone :-)