"orkhid22;c-16769226" wrote:
"Loanet;c-16769143" wrote:
"orkhid22;c-16769095" wrote:
"Loanet;c-16769087" wrote:
The purpose? Well if you must know, it's nice to have a post that tells the Gurus whether we're okay with their price/content ratio and the level of information we're getting.
While new animations aren't easy, devs do recycle and repurpose them where possible and there are a LOT to choose from. Cats and Dogs was so hard because every pet needed every animation to be brand new.
It's actively new coding that I look for in the actual value of a pack. For example, in Get To Work its value was in Active Careers and making your own shop. However the devs now know how to make active careers, so any new active careers created involve recycled code. Resturaunts and running your own vet clinic are based heavily on Get To Work code. I'm not sure how much of the Fame code will be recycled from Vampire perks.
I'm unaware of the Gurus setting price points. In my humble opinion, this doesn't appear to be out of genuine inquiry. But a way to minimize work someone has done that you believe isn't worthy and disguise it as a friendly discussion. We already know it's not cause the Gurus don't set the price of packs. These are men and women going to work everyday doing their job within the confines they are given.
You pick up on one misplaced word - 'their' - and start talking as if I seriously believe the Gurus set prices, or I'm attacking Gurus in general. Somebody asked why this poll was set up. I answered. The answer is, it's nice to know if people are happy with the price point and to let other people know whether people are happy. So, I'm afraid that 'your humble opinion', is wrong. It is genuine inquiry. Sorry 'bout that.
EA sets the prices. But EA doesn't read this board. Gurus do. I'm sure at least they like to know if people are happy or not.
All I ask for is a yes/no opinion to a yes/no question. If you don't feel like you can judge, don't. I personally think having 'maybe' as an option on polls is a bad idea, which is why there is no such option.
We'll agree to disagree.
I don't agree with that.
;)
JK, I do agree with some of the people here that the Fame coding looks interesting and useful. However I also think EA is taking advantage of its new tiered method of pricing to charge more for less. The Fame coding is being applied to a lot of jobs but you'll only see it if you have Get Famous, just like you only see Seasons with Seasons and only see clubs if you bought Get Together.