No Ballance between NOD and GDI

@TECMAXXTactically they have strengths and weakness so it depends on your strategy. They are definitely not the same and should not be treated as such.
Can you show your formations for each? The base defenses?
I'm guessing you are relying air in the early waves for gdi and not so much with nod?

Im not a mod and please take this as just opinion.

Edit: I also suspect the gdi base spyed the target and didn't attack and is a front line  base while the nod base gave little warming?

Ofc the Strategy of farming and army units used to attack outpost or camps are important hire....

Ofc NOD and GDi got 2 diffrents army units and strategy to farm......

but anyway over it.... if you take long time of playing you see a diffrence of units RT

im not writing hire about shooting to bases....

im just asking becouse on evry world you see same problem over all

i play a lot of NOD and a lot of GDI on few accounts so im not newbie like on forum.... get around 20 badges on all accounts so i see this problem not from today

and ofc you can get some cheery for GDI for low RT but its still will be much much less than NOD can get it.....

both fraction are very good and both are strong..... but anyway in a long term NOD got more easy way to get more profits from farm

thats why i just ask on forum if developers can have look at it... and if they decide all its fine i will accept thier answer but maybe if they look they will agree and try balance it in some update.

If your strategy is to farm only and in an identical strategy alliance, the defensive strategy of forgotten will learn to anticapate that.

And consider then the  general success of your strategy which will effect how the forgotten lay out their defenses.

The rt difference you mentioned is not imagined. But I myself have found that a commander can make their strategy to exploit the strengths of a chosen faction. 

I guess it depends of who is playing at the time as several people have complained that nod is disadvantaged in the past. So the solution was to make certain research much more expensive for gdi....?

Strategic success and failure does drive the experience. As for major changes? The changes I do notice are in responsiveness and feedback. Platforms tend to keep their core concepts intact and change their transparent structures to exploit new technologies.

that still not answering the Q about RT possibility to chane that or not.. :D

or even have look if that not really issue what can be fixed by some update or upgrade....

there is few idea what should be not any problem to check by develop team specjaly when people still pay lots of money to buy funds on this game...

few idea...

less effective on cobras shield...

less drain by unstoppable and unkillable salamander on wall

stronger shield on kodiac  

longer emp on orca

mamooth upgrade is too some kind of mistake

as a Druid says this game is old and its like classic old game... but that not reason to not try fix or balace the fraction game ofc if that needed and possible to make it

if im understand world good ... that evrythink is possible if you want to make it possible

so evrythink is in hand of developers team and people who look after this game not hire in forum

Your first post had two screenshots highlighting a 3x difference in repair time. 

With no further data there is no way to easily imagine why since there are an infinite amount of explainations why two sample attacks can be so different in regards to repair time. 

@F1jjYR3i think the problem is not in getting a more data but in the power of upgrades.
NOD using a 3 primary units to farm
Cobras - no RT cost till shield not get down
Salamanders - even if get dmg can rebuild to full life so no RT cost
commando shield - if nothink on way can pass without any dmg so without any RT
all of them if you set up your attack correctly you will get low or even non RT for shoot

GDI -
Orcas- EMP can stop enemy vehickles to shoot you so that lower your RT cost but duration is very low on higher units
Kodiack shield good to get RT lower but shield not inaf strong if you split it on all grounds  units..
mamooth battle ram just for walls.. unusual i think not work as it should work
if you set up your army correctly you can lower RT but still will be not even half like what you can save with NOD

both fraction got diffrent units and both got diffrent gameplay style....
on the end anyway nevermind what you do... in a matter of time NOD will be have allways more profits from his stronger upgrades.....

anyway i like to play both fraction at all.... but if in future developers will decide to change somethink i will be look at that changes with all my grattitude that someone still look after this game and a game got still support....

Nod or gdi have strengths and weaknesses tactically.
I believe their research paths reflect that.