Forum Discussion

5 Replies

  • Balladalidila's avatar
    Balladalidila
    Seasoned Ace
    5 years ago

    @audiofilomx 

    "PC Ranks over diamond are dominated by controller players since season 5........at master/pred lobbies 70-80% are controller players at least NA Servers"

    May I ask where you got these numbers from? I dont deny that AA is very strong in the hands of a skilled controller player, particularly in fast close quarter fights with high DPS guns, where you jump around and toggle between hip and ads all the time. Based on how AA works, i.e, automatically pulling/gravitating your aim towards an enemy in front of you, you would probably land alot of high dmg burst with high dps automatic guns just by shooting "towards" the enemy, when you on M+K would have missed,

    But unless you can prove me wrong with some evidence of this "70-80% controller domination at high elo PC", then I seriously  doubt that AA would make up for the lack of mid-to-long range precision and movement a skilled M+K player have.

  • Balladalidila's avatar
    Balladalidila
    Seasoned Ace
    5 years ago

    @audiofilomx 

    Still waiting for any kind of evidence that "70-80% of all masters and predators on PC are using controllers"  haha. 

    Also; I have also seen those 0.4 and 0.6 settings in the code for pc and console respectively. But neither you or me know how those numbers should be interpreted. You draw the conclusion that its 40 and 60%, but of what? Is 1.00 a sight that is continuously locks on any targets in front of you? We dont know that, do we?  We dont even know what scale it it. Is it even linear? 

    Seems to me that you just spread alot of rumors and false information about the AA issue, some based on your "gut feelings" and some based on your misconception of how the code should be interpreted.

  • audiofilomx's avatar
    audiofilomx
    5 years ago
    @Balladalidila Sure ill do it, I'm waiting to my brother to bring me 2 or 3 clips of ranked matches(last split), to do some good statistics just wait.
    Ilootgames claimed that the 1.00 on aim assist was full aimbot, and its the maximum value, with that in mind, 0.4 is 40% and 0.6 is 60%
    But Im good with the .6 on console, i know all the disadvantages (fps, frame latency, playing on TV, etc) but why having aim assist on PC?.
    That's where is trully cancer, controller players with full 144-240fps, 144hz-240hz monitors, and 40% aimassist is way too much, on Pc there're no disadvantages at all while using a controller.
    In all my aim assist threads i always said that the problem was PC, not Console.
  • E9ine_AC's avatar
    E9ine_AC
    Hero+
    5 years ago
    @Balladalidila Well if you count in how many are most likely using Xim to mask their pc into thinking a controller is main source of control and grants Aim assist to mouse and keyboard due to this trickery. I can think of a few off top of my head. =P
  • Balladalidila's avatar
    Balladalidila
    Seasoned Ace
    5 years ago

    @audiofilomx 

    I also read Ilootgames tweet about it but Im still sceptic since we dont have any information what this attribute in the code is doing. He claims "1" is full aimbot but all we know is that default settings is  "0.6" of an unknown code class called aimassist_magnet, right? If we dont know how aimassist_magnet handles the input value so we cant say anything what it means. It might as well have said aimassist_magnet 10000000 and it would have told us the same.

    So this information didnt tell us anything tbh. Or the only thing it told us is that "aimassist_magnet" input value for Console is 50% higher than for PC (whatever that means; does the code behind aimassist_magnet even handle these numbers linear?) and  I think its sad that Ilootgames posts this kind of (dis)information since it just creates alot of frustration, rumors and assumptions.

    And how is "your brothers 2-3 clips from his matches" gonna prove there are 80% controller players at PC Master+ ranked ?=)