Forum Discussion
I don't think I've ever said the things you said I did.
How about we only pay for games if they meet our expectations, that is the biggest BS to give as a counter argument.
You may think this is BS, but that's absolutely what you should be doing. It's simply not a good economic decision to buy a game that fails to meet your expectations to begin with. If you don't enjoy the game you're purchasing, you're just going to be frustrated while you wait for fixes that may or may not come. That doesn't exclude you from giving feedback to further improve the game though. You can absolutely do both.
Problem is I can't return it, and I can't say the game is good or bad until i actually try to play the game, understand the mechanics, and the overall balance of the game accounting what they advertise which usually takes a few days or more then 2 hours, Not to mention the game wasn't working at the beginning. So im stuck with it and since I paid for it I will hold them to what they promised for the base game. I don't mind waiting but when the choices they make lean towards COD, it feels like an empty promise
Oh and I mess up and placed a period instead of a coma. For better context
Not to mention you agree that there are issues but don't mind it cause it should be expected, how about we only pay for games if they meet our expectations, that is the biggest BS to give as a counter argument.
Ps economically speaking, the best way to support the game developers is to purchase the game at full price instead of waiting 3, 5, or more years to purchase it. From a gamer stand point it makes more sense to wait for the game to be on sale or has been battle test it for a few years before trying it. Guess what that'll lead to