On my 9800X3D and 9070 OC, I have less than 6m/s on my GPU to render a frame around 180FPS. CPU is even lower 2-3ms. Simulated on the server is less than 4ms. Legit metrics, mate. 1080p medium to high details.
400 FPS can be achieved, perhaps at 720p with OCed 9800X3D and OCed 5090 at low details + tinkering in graphics control panel with game profile settings in notepad.
10 -30 ms might be the overall monitor input lag at best. The LCD screen is like 1-8ms.
40+ ms or higher input lag might be only possible on the TV screen.
If you ask me, the overall latency between rendered 60FPS console vs 180FPS is less than 12ms. The only difference that can be physically witnessed is mouse responsiveness between 60 vs 120... which is pretty wild.
I have 3.5k/d in multiplayer (no bot farms involved). Redsec alone would be over 7k/d. Honestly, k/d means nothing, especially on the controller.
Anyone with IQ higher than room temperature would know without googling that 25% lower recoil with automatic movement tracking is more efficient than human predictive movement. Otherwise, how do you explain any triggerbots, spin-bots, or recoil-reduction cheats developed as we speak LOL.
You know nothing about rigs and never played against competitive players that actually won anything sponsored by EA.
Thank you Twordy,
My setup is almost the same. 5090 and a Ryzen 9950x3d. My rig cooks, it's 100% not a hardware issue for me, nor you.
I'm a smidge over a 3.1 KD on 90% conquest
Dude's like RatedChaotic have nothing to contribute, so they just argue.
Cheers!
