3vs3 GAC really?
So CG moved the crystal income to GAC making it the most important area of the game, and now they’re forcing us to play a stupid mode they invented just to give players something different a lot of ti...
Forum Discussion
"harvestmouse;c-2356163" wrote:"TVF;c-2356135" wrote:"harvestmouse;c-2356133" wrote:"TVF;c-2356116" wrote:
It works fine because everyone is on the same playing field.
Are they though? Some players are going to be much better suited to 3v3. So the division/league you're in is based on your 5v5 capabilities. It doesn't seem very even.
Whose fault is that though?
Hmmmm CG's? Because they set up our new league system (which I love) then changed the game?
Let's say we have a football/soccer league (take England for example). There's a long line of divisions that go all the way down to grass roots.
You play 11 a side for several seasons, which creates divisions with teams that are competitive with each other.
Then the next season the FA (Football Association) say 'Ok, we're not playing 11 a side this season, we're going 5 a side!'
That would just be crazy. The divisions have been sculpted on 11 a side football and now the teams have to face each other at 5 a side.
Ok, our situation isn't as severe, but it's an analogy, no?
I'm not opposed to 3v3 being a thing, I just don't think it should be in GAC for the reason above.
3v3 has existed a long time in GAC thus rendering your analogy especially awful. But that's par for the course in the forums. Analogies are always awful.
