Around the 8-10 minute mark in the Clone Wars TV series, Season 5 Episode 19 titled "To Catch a Jedi", Ashoka tells Ventress herself the following: "You're a Separatist war criminal and a Sith." I reiterate "AND A SITH!" The Asajj we have is said to be the "Nightsister/Separatist" only version, meaning no Bounty Hunter and no Sith tag. But she was never a Separatist when she wasn't a Sith, then. She was a Separatist the same time she was a Sith and a Nightsister (by birth). Then she was a Nightsister (by baptism) and a BH later on. We can't have a version of her that never existed!

Ashoka doesn't get to decide who is officially a sith or not.

"CG_CapGaSP;906698" wrote:The version of Asajj we have in game currently will not be getting the Sith affiliation.

In the case of Asaaj Ventress, she is a dark jedi/ Sith aspirant. Another term is that she is a dark side adept. Ventress is also Dooku's "secret" apprenntice. She is Dooku's assassin, not a Sith. Dooku/Darth Tyranus hopes to use her to beat Palpatine/Sidious. Only then could Dooku make Ventress his true apprentice. However, she is no secret as Sidious realizes that Dooku is training her in a future attempt to kill him. Darth Sidious orders Dooku to kill her, but she survives.So pretty much she almost a sith but not quite

"Kyno;c-1071268" wrote:"CG_CapGaSP;906698" wrote:The version of Asajj we have in game currently will not be getting the Sith affiliation.This statement just sounds kinda weird because if the current version wouldn't get the sith tag, which assajj version should it be? They should say it cleary if shes not a sith instead.

Remember that the Jedi had no idea who the second Sith was. They knew Dooku was, but they didn't know if he was the master or apprentice. It would have been natural to assume Ventress was the apprentice up until the time Savage took her place. But she was never a Sith. She was never given the Darth title. Sidious expressly forbade Dooku to treat her as a Sith or an apprentice. She was merely an assassin who worked for him.Savage would be no different if he were the Savage under Dooku's employ, but when he was with Maul they were calling themselves Sith, and they saw themselves as having their own rule of two, because they wanted to eliminate Sidious and Dooku. That violates the rule of two with other Sith already in operation, but it's not the first time a rival pair had arisen to the two who were in the line from Darth Bane, and there were a number of times in the Legends canon when a third Sith was in training while the two were still both alive, e.g. Darth Maul was actually the third Sith at the time of Episode 1, since Darth Plagueis was still alive at that time. Plagueis was even still alive when Sidious took on Dooku.

Asajj Ventress is a SITH!!! | EA Forums

QuiksliverUK
8 years ago
Ashoka doesn't get to decide who is officially a sith or not.
NyKynoe
8 years ago
"CG_CapGaSP;906698" wrote:
The version of Asajj we have in game currently will not be getting the Sith affiliation.
joseybizzle1991
8 years ago
In the case of Asaaj Ventress, she is a dark jedi/ Sith aspirant. Another term is that she is a dark side adept. Ventress is also Dooku's "secret" apprenntice. She is Dooku's assassin, not a Sith. Dooku/Darth Tyranus hopes to use her to beat Palpatine/Sidious. Only then could Dooku make Ventress his true apprentice. However, she is no secret as Sidious realizes that Dooku is training her in a future attempt to kill him. Darth Sidious orders Dooku to kill her, but she survives.

So pretty much she almost a sith but not quite
JStenholt97
8 years ago
"Kyno;c-1071268" wrote:
"CG_CapGaSP;906698" wrote:
The version of Asajj we have in game currently will not be getting the Sith affiliation.

This statement just sounds kinda weird because if the current version wouldn't get the sith tag, which assajj version should it be? They should say it cleary if shes not a sith instead.
Parableman
8 years ago
Remember that the Jedi had no idea who the second Sith was. They knew Dooku was, but they didn't know if he was the master or apprentice. It would have been natural to assume Ventress was the apprentice up until the time Savage took her place. But she was never a Sith. She was never given the Darth title. Sidious expressly forbade Dooku to treat her as a Sith or an apprentice. She was merely an assassin who worked for him.

Savage would be no different if he were the Savage under Dooku's employ, but when he was with Maul they were calling themselves Sith, and they saw themselves as having their own rule of two, because they wanted to eliminate Sidious and Dooku. That violates the rule of two with other Sith already in operation, but it's not the first time a rival pair had arisen to the two who were in the line from Darth Bane, and there were a number of times in the Legends canon when a third Sith was in training while the two were still both alive, e.g. Darth Maul was actually the third Sith at the time of Episode 1, since Darth Plagueis was still alive at that time. Plagueis was even still alive when Sidious took on Dooku.
RacerDejak
8 years ago
Try to bring dispeller in sith team? nice try tho ;)
Dark_Helmet152
8 years ago
"robertohui;c-1071320" wrote:
Technically, Asajj is not a Sith, but not Savage also, but he has been tagged as Sith. There is no doubts in any of these 2 assumptions.
In conclusion, if Savage is considered to be a Sith so Asajj should have Sith tag.
For only this reason we should ask this to be fixed.

What makes Savage not a sith? He was trained by a sith to be a sith. Asajj was trained by a sith to be an assassin.
Waquira
8 years ago
This thread again....

Once every 2—4 weeks.
Dark_Helmet152
8 years ago
"robertohui;c-1071390" wrote:
I am afraid all of you who said that Asajj is not a Sith clearly are wrong.
Here is her affiliation on Sith based on Star Wars official site:
http://www.starwars.com/databank/asajj-ventress

"Asajj Ventress yearned to be considered a true Sith, but such status wasn't allowed under the Sith's Rule of Two"

Straight from the link you provided.
SnakesssOnAPlan
8 years ago
"robertohui;c-1071390" wrote:
I am afraid all of you who said that Asajj is not a Sith clearly are wrong.
Here is her affiliation on Sith based on Star Wars official site:
http://www.starwars.com/databank/asajj-ventress

"Dark_Helmet152;c-1071427" wrote:
"robertohui;c-1071390" wrote:
I am afraid all of you who said that Asajj is not a Sith clearly are wrong.
Here is her affiliation on Sith based on Star Wars official site:
http://www.starwars.com/databank/asajj-ventress

"Asajj Ventress yearned to be considered a true Sith, but such status wasn't allowed under the Sith's Rule of Two"

Straight from the link you provided.

IKR? I was reading that and was like WTFook?