Anyone having issues with this part? My Inquisitors are upgraded more than last time yet I, as well as other guild mates, cant get a win with them this time.

Different team? There are only 5 Inquisitors to use for the feat.

Because it was too easy, so they fixed all the things benefiting players while leaving all the bugs that cause a problem to players in. They'll get to those "eventually"My LV and then my Rey team just got beaten by a Thrawn team on a regular node (not a challenge node) because of that Imperial edict (bonus attacks and increased offense from attacks!) and overprepared BS level 400 rubbish. Yay this is so fun!It's as if CG is trying to get us to NOT want to play conquest so we don't get the max crate.

Noticed a pattern, many are getting BB as a squad, makes it much harder for low gear inquisitors

"LordDirt;c-2368220" wrote:"StarSon;c-2368178" wrote:"LordDirt;c-2368174" wrote:Different team? There are only 5 Inquisitors to use for the feat.Enemy team. There are 4 or 5 different options.I had BB last time and have them again this time. They definitely upped the stats, but it's still do-able for me.And no need to farm OR or SE feats on that node, use a treasure node.How are you killing them?Mostly they kill themselves since I have the debuff disk setup. It would be easier with another AA though.

"LordDirt;c-2368225" wrote:"StarSon;c-2368221" wrote:"LordDirt;c-2368220" wrote:"StarSon;c-2368178" wrote:"LordDirt;c-2368174" wrote:Different team? There are only 5 Inquisitors to use for the feat.Enemy team. There are 4 or 5 different options.I had BB last time and have them again this time. They definitely upped the stats, but it's still do-able for me.And no need to farm OR or SE feats on that node, use a treasure node.How are you killing them?Mostly they kill themselves since I have the debuff disk setup. It would be easier with another AA though.What is your setup exactly?https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/940373398280867872/988530157977485333/conquest.pngNote: Since my earlier post and this one I pulled a white Caustic and blue Protection Recovery to put on the blue AA. Earlier I had only the green AA and white AA.

Conquest Section 5 Darth Malgus section with Inquisitors

Persimius
Rising Scout
3 years ago
"KellinDrexel;c-2368374" wrote:
Bad Batch seems to be a trend and ally Malgus seems to melt now compared to the enemy Malgus in the boss node.
Come one guys! You're not spending enough!

I spent $0 on Inquisitors and don't have any issues with BB in this node. Using OR and SE on some treasure nodes. Not sure what the problem is.
ccmoose
Rising Novice
3 years ago
You really don't notice that it's harder than the previous Conquest? I got the same team as last time-Bad Batch. Last time, I could easily win, even with my G11 Inqs at 70% stamina. This time, with 100% stamina, it's been a nail biter.

Is this a problem? Well, that's a matter of opinion. But it fits into the mold of CG prioritizing fixes to problems that benefit the players over those that disadvantage them. Combine that with their track record as of late, and people's outrage is on a hair trigger.
ccmoose
Rising Novice
3 years ago
"StarSon;c-2368386" wrote:
Which would be fine.

That's your opinion. Others have a different one.
Morgoth_swgoh
Seasoned Novice
3 years ago
"petersont79;c-2368214" wrote:
Noticed a pattern, many are getting BB as a squad, makes it much harder for low gear inquisitors

Last time BB was stiil super easy for 3*-5* inquisitors with g8-g11. Pretty sure that's not the case this time around, so increased frequency of BB opponents isn't the real issue here. The issue is they made the node significantly harder and as always did so without any form of communication.
thedrjojo
Seasoned Newcomer
3 years ago
Aa x 2 (green and white), ca x3 (blue and 2 green), va (blue), te (green), press auto, got my r5 9th sister down to 3% stamina and was still winning vs BB with 3-4 standing.
jmjessemac
3 years ago
"Ragnarok_COTF;c-2368383" wrote:
You really don't notice that it's harder than the previous Conquest? I got the same team as last time-Bad Batch. Last time, I could easily win, even with my G11 Inqs at 70% stamina. This time, with 100% stamina, it's been a nail biter.

Is this a problem? Well, that's a matter of opinion. But it fits into the mold of CG prioritizing fixes to problems that benefit the players over those that disadvantage them. Combine that with their track record as of late, and people's outrage is on a hair trigger.

It’s a problem in that they made changes without telling us despite saying they don’t make changes to conquest unless there’s something not working right (and only then if you’re lucky)
Persimius
Rising Scout
3 years ago
"Jesse36;c-2368491" wrote:
"Ragnarok_COTF;c-2368383" wrote:
You really don't notice that it's harder than the previous Conquest? I got the same team as last time-Bad Batch. Last time, I could easily win, even with my G11 Inqs at 70% stamina. This time, with 100% stamina, it's been a nail biter.

Is this a problem? Well, that's a matter of opinion. But it fits into the mold of CG prioritizing fixes to problems that benefit the players over those that disadvantage them. Combine that with their track record as of late, and people's outrage is on a hair trigger.

It’s a problem in that they made changes without telling us despite saying they don’t make changes to conquest unless there’s something not working right (and only then if you’re lucky)

They've never said that. But also it wasn't working right, so if they did say that then that's why they changed it.
ccmoose
Rising Novice
3 years ago
"StarSon;c-2368492" wrote:
But also it wasn't working right...

Who said it wasn't working "right"? You have inside information the rest of us don't? Obviously, CG wanted to change it. But I doubt that's because it was broken or "wrong". CG probably just didn't like how easy it was to clear, so they tweaked it.

Frankly, this really isn't that big of a deal. It's just that it's a small deal in a massive pile of small deals. Your insistence on defending CG in this matter is more perplexing to me than those who are upset because they were able to beat it last time, planned accordingly this time, and were then blindsided by a change that went unannounced.
Persimius
Rising Scout
3 years ago
"Ragnarok_COTF;c-2368502" wrote:
"StarSon;c-2368492" wrote:
But also it wasn't working right...

Who said it wasn't working "right"? You have inside information the rest of us don't? Obviously, CG wanted to change it. But I doubt that's because it was broken or "wrong".

The datamine showed the stat boosts lower than expected last Conquest. Normally for s5 they are much higher, and with this release they were raised to the expected level.

CG probably just didn't like how easy it was to clear, so they tweaked it.

Sure, wouldn't surprise me. Last time they wanted us to have an easy way to do these things and this time they wanted to force us to use treasure nodes. We've also had an extra month to work on Inquisitors to make the difficulty bump manageable.
dmgutie
New Spectator
3 years ago
"Ragnarok_COTF;c-2368502" wrote:

Who said it wasn't working "right"?

Common sense said it wasn't working right. People complain about GLs getting outsped in Zone 5, but G11 inquisitors easily go first? It was clear that they messed up and didn't add the +90% stat bonuses that are supposed to be present at the end of Zone 5.