GAC ranking is irrational
Are there any plans to fix GAC? When will winning carry the weight it should? Someone with one loss should never rank higher than someone with zero losses no matter how many banners. What this cr...
Forum Discussion
"DarjeloSalas;c-2202111" wrote:
As Kyno mentioned, it doesn’t seem rational to consider all wins of equal merit,
It's actually very funny because there are huge amount of championships in the world (videogames included) with exactly that golden rule - all wins are equal. And if this rule cannot be applied to the GAC scoring, it just one more confirmation that GAC scoring is flawed in several ways, not that the rule itself doesn't seem rational.
"Waqui;c-2202115" wrote:
A win is a win disregarding whether it was won bye tiebreaker or not - and that's common in competitive sports (/environments).
Yeah, a win is a win... yet somehow in the GAC many wins and loses are different, with value often controlled not by you but by your opponent. And that's exactly the point which TS is trying to made:
Someone with one loss should never rank higher than someone with zero losses no matter how many banners.
