If you take more than one attempt to beat a team, you should lose any chance at bonus points in GAC for protection, unused characters etc. if you can’t beat it first try, you don’t deserve to beat someone that beat the same amount of teams as you that did beat it on first try. The fact that I just lost a GAC matchup when I cleared the same amount of teams as my opponent on my first try and he took two tries on two of my opponents, means the scoring system is broken. Under no circumstance should this occur. You guys are a joke

"srwhitewvu;d-219553" wrote:If you take more than one attempt to beat a team, you should lose any chance at bonus points in GAC for protection, unused characters etc. if you can’t beat it first try, you don’t deserve to beat someone that beat the same amount of teams as you that did beat it on first try. The fact that I just lost a GAC matchup when I cleared the same amount of teams as my opponent on my first try and he took two tries on two of my opponents, means the scoring system is broken. Under no circumstance should this occur. You guys are a jokeSo you think that just because someone lost 20 points on a battle, that you should win even though you lost more than 20 points across all battles? That is a joke.

Sorry, but it makes gac more interesting if you still have a chance to win even if you lose one battle. Conversely, it’s also more interesting if you know you can still lose and still have to be efficient and use good counters.

"leef;c-2015850" wrote:the max banners you can earn on the 2nd try is only 44. That's less than winning on the first try with 1 unit left without full protection and health (46 banners). Not sure what the problem is.. The problem is OP managed to play inefficiently enough that their opponent could make up for 2 extra battles, but feels entitled to a win despite performing worse according to the established scoring method.

"srwhitewvu;c-2015838" wrote:If you can’t beat someone on the first try twice, you aren’t as good as someone that can beat the same amount of teams in the first try. I don’t care how good you do in your other battles. If it takes more than one attempt twice and the other guy doesn’t lose, the person who took less tries is betterIf you clear everything on first attempt and still lose to someone that just dropped 20 banners for each loss, you are clearly not better.

GAC scoring | EA Forums

51 Replies

srwhitewvu
6 years ago
If you are correct, the max you can get on 2nd try, then it would have been mathematically impossible for him to beat me as he would have had to average 71.66 points on the three other tries to get the score he got which I know is not possible.
srwhitewvu
6 years ago
Yeah, I think something is wrong with the scoring. Even if it’s 54 max on second try, he would have had to average 65 on the three other tries which is definitely not possible
srwhitewvu
6 years ago
srwhitewvu
6 years ago
TheSithVicious
6 years ago
"srwhitewvu;c-2016019" wrote:
First of all either of us cleared. Both of us couldn’t beat the other’s darth Revan. Second of all, the goal of this game is to win matches. The scoring system should not be such that someone can beat someone when they lose the match. Under the current scoring system, someone could win the match with one toon left and less than full health and protection and score 51 points. Then the other person could face the same team lose the match leaving the team with one toon with little health left, they can then use one toon and take out the last team and score 54 points. This is total nonsense as clearly the player that actually won on the first try performed better than the guy that didn’t. The system rewards mediocrity. I like systems that reward winning. It is a joke.

Your scoring is off as DuneFlint pointed out. But regardless, look at it this way. All the individual "matches" you are referring to are collectively just one single match. Each individual battle is a round that makes up the match. Just like in boxing, you can lose one or two rounds and still win the match by winning more rounds than the other guy. So, you did win a few rounds, but your opponent won more rounds than you did and therefore won the match.
DuneFlint
6 years ago
Can we see your drevan zone? Did you maybe only put 2 defenses there instead of 3? If you put all 3 that means they actually beat 6 teams, 4 on bottom, 2 on top
TheSithVicious
6 years ago
Also, you could be cool about it and message him in game. Just ask how he pulled it off. I've learned a few tricks by chatting opponents up.
ZapZapZipZap
6 years ago
He got more points for clearing your back char zone than you got got clearing his back ship zone.
ZapZapZipZap
6 years ago
Also, it looks like he cleared 6 char teams and you only cleared 4 char teams and 1 ship team.
deathbringer59
Seasoned Veteran
6 years ago
^^^ toon sectors are worth 180 banners for conqueror and ship sector is worth 153 banners. Him taking your toon sector was more worth it. Also who knows if he used undersized teams or not to get more banner.