is anyone else demotivated this conquest?

"Hermitthedruid;c-2390204" wrote:

"Thorozar11;c-2390166" wrote:

"Hermitthedruid;c-2390107" wrote:

"Starslayer;c-2390076" wrote:

"Hermitthedruid;c-2390009" wrote:

"TVF;c-2390005" wrote:

"Hermitthedruid;c-2390003" wrote:

"Antario;c-2389975" wrote:

"Hermitthedruid;c-2389958" wrote:

"TVF;c-2389957" wrote:

"Hermitthedruid;c-2389954" wrote:
This Conquest is demotivating because the disks suck compared to past offerings.

Disagree.

I stopped using the VA/AA combo a while ago anyway, I'll happily take the return of Entrenched instead.

Entrenched is much weaker than VA-AA.

“Weak” is situational.

Entrenched gives out Protection-up buff. And it stacks. Equip three Entrenched discs, that’s 30% extra TM for your imps, enough to outrun some teams even in sector 4 and 5.

A niche interaction with a one-off faction is the best counterargument you can come up with? ?

That's only one reason for why it's good. :D

Let me know when those other reasons are as strong or as universal as “use AOE abilities”, “scaling damage to max health”, or “triggering abilities with free debuffs”.

“Surviving the initial onslaught when opponents go first because of crazy high speed so you can get 3* with a lot of different teams, which is the real difficulty of a fight in Conquest”

That’s nowhere near as strong lol. VA-AA lets me win with one LV AOE that I can go first in 99% of encounters. Asking to survive IT or GI, while not going first with just a handful of Entrenched disks, is a fool’s errand.

Now who is using situational stuff? LV? Ok one toon that few have vs surviving the initial onslaught with loads of teams that you can now 3 star vs 2 or 1 without.

So situational that you couldn’t have possibly done the “win with one move” feat without LV, right? https://youtu.be/EdJFcluon5A

Why are you so dead-set on letting your S5 boss take turns, with or without LV? https://youtu.be/6-33tLMtuzA