is anyone else demotivated this conquest?

"AlexanderG;c-2390614" wrote:

"ScoundrelRui;c-2390610" wrote:

"TVF;c-2390600" wrote:
I'm sure you have data to prove most people dislike conquest.

Do you have that setup as a keyboard shortcut?

I'm sure that you also have data to prove that most people love conquest.

I could go on with a pointless argument, but instead I'll offer some constructive criticism of conquest and tell you why it's easy for me to pretty much skip this conquest.

1, the rewards, trying to force more inquisitor garbage down our throats, for my roster there's plenty of things ahead of trashquisitors that I prefer to gear up (and on a personal note, the way CG has rolled them out just makes me hate them more).

2, the repetitiveness, aside from changing the bosses and mini-bosses, you always fight the same teams with the same modifiers, Padme with steadfast retribution, phoenix with the odds and overprepared. Try swapping the modifiers around, even include the "don't kill the leader" ones from boss battles.

Alas TVF is correct here. Make a claim, support it with evidence. Or get called out for making assertions based on personal opinions.

There's no winning an argument here. CG has in all probability (going to fail here as I have no data at all) what brings in engagement and money. Conquest is designed to bring in important characters or ships. It's necessary whether we personally like it or not.

Personally I think Conquest is OK. I'd rather play it than do nothing. I'm probably not alone in that regard.

My remark about proving that people love conquest using data was more of a joke because none of us have that information, that's why I said it was a pointless argument and listed why I personally don't care about this cycle of conquest.