is anyone else demotivated this conquest?

"ScoundrelRui;c-2390610" wrote:

"TVF;c-2390600" wrote:
I'm sure you have data to prove most people dislike conquest.

Do you have that setup as a keyboard shortcut?

I'm sure that you also have data to prove that most people love conquest.

I could go on with a pointless argument, but instead I'll offer some constructive criticism of conquest and tell you why it's easy for me to pretty much skip this conquest.

1, the rewards, trying to force more inquisitor garbage down our throats, for my roster there's plenty of things ahead of trashquisitors that I prefer to gear up (and on a personal note, the way CG has rolled them out just makes me hate them more).

2, the repetitiveness, aside from changing the bosses and mini-bosses, you always fight the same teams with the same modifiers, Padme with steadfast retribution, phoenix with the odds and overprepared. Try swapping the modifiers around, even include the "don't kill the leader" ones from boss battles.

Change everything each conquest and it will requires much more time to clear it, which i don’t think would be a good thing. Diskcques and feats already make every conquest trilogy different. Throw in a few unique battles (mini boss and boss) and you have a good balance imo. One thing i would like to change though is to dial down a couple of feats, like 40 battles with a faction.

And about your point 1): if you only did conquest for the rewards before and not because you enjoy it at least a little bit, it’s probably a good idea not to do it. It’s a game after all.