Forum Discussion
NotRealUltra
4 years agoLegend
"PumaK;c-2365929" wrote:"Ultra;c-2365919" wrote:"Jakdnels;c-2365896" wrote:No"Ultra;c-2365895" wrote:"AlexanderG;c-2365889" wrote:
I think a pilot or test run would have been a good idea.
If only they announced an exhibition phase....
Doesn't that just mean we're the beta testers? Do the results of the GACs or TWs during the exhibition phase not count?
It means CG wants your opinion on what went right and wrong with datacrons and wants to give a trial period on how it works, and whats it like
But do you really think they want the feedback and isn't a complete lie? With the leak it was evident the reaction and what people think about. People wrote feedback a lot of time about a lot of things, but nothing it's applied. As example the lot of feedback about the bugs on JMK event battles, and up to date, seems like the feedback it's fully ignored and nothing get fixed.
How do you know if feedback isn't applied?
We are only seeing the final product, the initial leaked version showed the materials required relic salvage, but they were looking for feedback from beta people, so it seems they listened, and they changed the relic requirements for getting bonuses too
Bug defects aren't feedback though
I know when it came to conquest some feedback was implemented, but in exchange they made some things worse (less feats in exchange for more nodes aka grind)
They listened to our feedback about Pit raid and removed the whole "post damage at same time" but buffed the raid bosses after certain % of the run
They listen to feedback but compensate somehow so you might think they don't listen
Featured Places
SWGOH General Discussion
Discuss and share your feedback on Star Wars: Galaxy of Heroes with fellow players.Latest Activity: 9 hours agoCommunity Highlights
- CG_Meathead8 months ago
Capital Games Team