GAC matchmaking

"Antario;c-2396082" wrote:

"Silcrow;c-2396059" wrote:

"Antario;c-2396048" wrote:

"MasterGomez87;c-2396046" wrote:
alot of people hate it (matchmaking in general not talking about 3vs3). and the oppisate is true just because YOU like it doesnt mean alot of people dont or that it IS popular. goes both ways. matchmaking by far isnt Fair. when im aurorium 1 and facing on opp with Every GL in the game thats wildly unfair and not right.

What do you consider fair and right? Always similar GP match ups? There are players who can easily beat others with similar GPs, because they have superior tactics, mods and datacrons. They want to beat players with better roster, more GLs and more GP than them. And you don't want to allow them to do that. Why is this fair and right?

my enemy has Full relicked squads in defence. He also has relicked offense lined up to beat me up. Like, i am talking about this guy has Relic 7s. I dont even have 7 relicked character. Do you consider this "fair"?

You can face the same situation with GP matchmaking, just the opposite way. In the old days of GP matchmaking, people like me with a very focused roster are frequently matched with players with bloated rosters. It was very easy to beat them, because all my GAC relevant characters are reliced, while theirs are not. So, you see, GP-based matchmaking is not the answer to your question.

I agree on gp based matchmaking is not something good. But this is not a this or that type of thing. as you can see i never said bring gp based matchmaking here. What we need is actually somehow preventing big gp rosters to fall into the places that low gp rosters and ruin their experiences just because they are not always "active". This is counterproductive for any sort of new player. there is a guy in my guild that has 800 k gp. He is in carbonite and got matched with 4-5 m rosters. Keep in mind, he is getting matched vs 5-6 x of his gp.