Forum Discussion

olddumper's avatar
2 years ago

Replace a round of 3 vs 3 with this.

3 vs 3 is substantially worse than 5 vs 5 and although I have come to terms with 3 vs 3 I think many would like to see its role diminished. I would suggest a new form of GAC with a new map call Big 3. This would replace every other round of 3 vs 3.

The map would have 3 zones all on the front line each allowing for one 5-man squad defense to be set for defense. Similar to ROTE one zone would be dark side, one zone would be neutral and one would be light side. On defense, only dark side characters can be set in the dark side zone and only light side characters can be set in the light side zone. For your attacks it would be flipped, you would have to attack your opponents dark side defense with light side characters. You get unlimited attacks per zone but the defense scores points for each attack they resist.

In each zone the defense would get environmental bonuses to make them more formidable to resist attacks. Proposed bonuses below but CG should toon according to testing.

Dark Side: Each character gains 10% offense, 10% crit damage, and 10% potency for each relic level.

Neutral: Each character gains 10 speed, 10% max protection and 10% offense for each relic level.

Light Side: Each character gains 10% defense, 10% health, and 10% tenacity for each relic level.

Tying the bonuses to relics will reward players for building up relic levels rewarding quality over quantity, something that has been missing since rewards moved out of arena. 3 vs 3 Omnis could proc an environmental bonus instead of their typical functionality if they need balancing but honestly you could probably just let them apply to all 5 toons without any repercussions. You could incorporate ships as a back zone but honestly people probably would miss ships. This would represent a return back to what arena used to be where having the best squad was important not having the best squads, while acknowledging the game has progressed and you would need multiple defenses with buffs to make the game mode more enjoyable.

20 Replies

  • "Olddumper;c-2452974" wrote:
    "LordDirt;c-2452973" wrote:
    "Olddumper;d-267597" wrote:
    3 vs 3 is substantially worse than 5 vs 5


    Please dont speak for me or others



    https://www.reddit.com/r/SWGalaxyOfHeroes/comments/13cf82d/thoughts_on_3v3_gac/

    Let’s start from some data about 82% of users prefer 5 vs 5.


    Citing reddit as a source of data? Ha!
  • riklass's avatar
    riklass
    Rising Scout
    2 years ago
    "TVF;c-2453093" wrote:
    "Olddumper;c-2452974" wrote:
    "LordDirt;c-2452973" wrote:
    "Olddumper;d-267597" wrote:
    3 vs 3 is substantially worse than 5 vs 5


    Please dont speak for me or others



    https://www.reddit.com/r/SWGalaxyOfHeroes/comments/13cf82d/thoughts_on_3v3_gac/

    Let’s start from some data about 82% of users prefer 5 vs 5.


    Citing reddit as a source of data? Ha!


    This thread seems to show the inverse of the reddit data.
  • I dislike 3v3 so count me in w/ supporting reddit data.

    That said, while I don't think the idea of 1-team defense is a great one, I sort of like the idea of classifying a zone by faction.

    Would be interesting to see a zone that didn't have Jabba, LV, JMK, & Rey all forming a wall of GLs.

    It might also be interesting to "blend" the teams instead of rotating the event, so something like 5v5 in the front & 3v3 in the back zone which is faction mixed.

    Actually the more I think about it........

    4 Zones:
    LS 5v5
    DS 5v5
    Mixed 3v3
    Fleet

    And then "Randomize" the placement for each GAC.

    LS & Fleet up front one time... DS & 3v3 as a top back/front another, etc etc.

    Not sure how much the coding would need to change to account for the Blend & the Rotation, but, it would make things more interesting each month IMO.

  • When 3v3 first came out, I wasn't a fan. But I've grown to like it. I enjoy the change from 5v5 as far as strategy and using different team comps. Gives the mode a little more variety. Now if they went to all 5v5 i think it would probably get boring (for me at least). Also, how many people participated in that Reddit survey? I didn't lol. Not sure how accurate their data set is
  • If you want to make it a new 5v5 mode, you would be better off replacing 5v5 gacs. Just because you do not like something doesn't mean that others feel that way as well.

    There are a million places in the game you can do 5v5 fights, leave our one 3v3 mode alone.
  • McPubeSack's avatar
    McPubeSack
    Seasoned Scout
    2 years ago
    3v3 is great. Get to try different team comps and more characters are viable. B)
  • "Jimster1;c-2453206" wrote:
    How about a hybrid instead of 5v5 and 3v3 maybe one sector is 3v3 whilst the other is 5v5. It'll help people fill spots with teams as 3v3 usually does but still have 5v5. The one thing I like about 3v3 is I feel I have more toons to use, where in 5v5 I have to either put a weaker defense or go in with a weaker offense. In 3v3 there's more teams but I usually have like one or two teams short of what a I need rather than 3 or 4.


    This would actually be another fun shake up.
  • "Nagz;c-2453512" wrote:
    If CG weren't cowards they would make a in-game choice where people would vote on wether they want the 3v3 or 5v5.
    After, i dunno, 2 weeks the loser would be excluded for a year of GAC.

    Let the people decide and then suffer the consequences of democracy in action.


    Yeah, make a purge of all the people who think different than the majority. That is the perfect definition of democracy, right?
  • "Nagz;c-2453512" wrote:
    If CG weren't cowards they would make a in-game choice where people would vote on wether they want the 3v3 or 5v5.
    After, i dunno, 2 weeks the loser would be excluded for a year of GAC.

    Let the people decide and then suffer the consequences of democracy in action.


    Or just let people pick each round if they personally want to do 5 vs 5 or 3 vs 3. I would honestly never play a round of 3 vs 3 again.
  • "Olddumper;c-2453534" wrote:
    "Nagz;c-2453512" wrote:
    If CG weren't cowards they would make a in-game choice where people would vote on wether they want the 3v3 or 5v5.
    After, i dunno, 2 weeks the loser would be excluded for a year of GAC.

    Let the people decide and then suffer the consequences of democracy in action.


    Or just let people pick each round if they personally want to do 5 vs 5 or 3 vs 3. I would honestly never play a round of 3 vs 3 again.


    You already get to choose if you do it or not, no different than choosing to do fleet arena, TB, or TW. Time to accept that GAC is a game mode that will always include 3v3 and 5v5.

About SWGOH General Discussion

Discuss and share your feedback on Star Wars: Galaxy of Heroes with fellow players.81,197 PostsLatest Activity: 20 minutes ago