Top 2 GAC Kyber spots.... really?

You get matched base on the gp of your top 80 chars,they have some relics but the gp is spread evenly over like 130 character and when they get matched up they will not get high gas or gl players,they are matched with others that have a similar roster.

Yeah I understand how the matching works.... not much of a championship having 2nd rate rosters winning it though. After the first round, they should be matching to where you are on the leaderboard.

You clearly do not understand how the GAC tournament format works.

"Kurgen;c-2119446" wrote:
Yeah I understand how the matching works.... not much of a championship having 2nd rate rosters winning it though. After the first round, they should be matching to where you are on the leaderboard.

People gaming the system is all it is. There are many that would love to continue building their rosters but don't so that they can game the current system and continue to get easy GAC wins. This is also why I have chosen not to be part of the leaderboards game. Personally, I'd rather have fun with my roster than not doing anything to it and just hoard everything.

The best players in a division are not necessarily the ones with the most GP.

If I drive a Ferrari and you drive a Honda Civic and I best you in a race, that does not necessarily make me the better driver.

"Rath_Tarr;c-2119632" wrote:
The best players in a division are not necessarily the ones with the most GP.

That kind of goes without saying really.

"Rath_Tarr;c-2119632" wrote:
If I drive a Ferrari and you drive a Honda Civic and I best you in a race, that does not necessarily make me the better driver.

Those 2 shouldn't be in the same race together. When GAC was first announced they made it seem like it would mean something to be first and on top. What we got is if you don't play this very, very linear way, you'll be penalized for it.

"MetaThumper;c-2119689" wrote:

"Rath_Tarr;c-2119632" wrote:
The best players in a division are not necessarily the ones with the most GP.

That kind of goes without saying really.

It ought to but around here it often doesn't seem to.

"MetaThumper;c-2119689" wrote:

"Rath_Tarr;c-2119632" wrote:
If I drive a Ferrari and you drive a Honda Civic and I best you in a race, that does not necessarily make me the better driver.

Those 2 shouldn't be in the same race together. When GAC was first announced they made it seem like it would mean something to be first and on top. What we got is if you don't play this very, very linear way, you'll be penalized for it.

And what very, very linear way would that be? Because my way is anything but linear, yet I have managed to make Kyber every GAC so far while progressing through four divisions.

What are the ally codes? And yours? We have tools to compare rosters, if you post them.

"Mephisto_style;c-2119832" wrote:
What are the ally codes? And yours? We have tools to compare rosters, if you post them.

I've learned the hard way trying to prove anything on these forums so I'll pass, thank you though. I wasn't saying I had a better roster either so not sure how that would change the topic at hand.

"Rath_Tarr;c-2119632" wrote:


And what very, very linear way would that be? Because my way is anything but linear, yet I have managed to make Kyber every GAC so far while progressing through four divisions.

Congrats. That's awesome news and glad you're having a fun time. When I say linear, I'm referring to following CG's path of success and how you are kind of forced to stay on that path if you want to remain competitive and be a leaderboard fanatic. But I don't look at GAC achievements and rankings as a very good indicator on how good someone or their roster is. Just look at what's up there now.

"MetaThumper;c-2119847" wrote:

"Rath_Tarr;c-2119632" wrote:


And what very, very linear way would that be? Because my way is anything but linear, yet I have managed to make Kyber every GAC so far while progressing through four divisions.

Congrats. That's awesome news and glad you're having a fun time. When I say linear, I'm referring to following CG's path of success and how you are kind of forced to stay on that path if you want to remain competitive and be a leaderboard fanatic. But I don't look at GAC achievements and rankings as a very good indicator on how good someone or their roster is. Just look at what's up there now.

And once again, what would that path be exactly?