Post badge dictators and poi greed

Over the years this has been suggested many times (or slight variations) but hasn't been acted upon so I doubt anything will change. 

As you have stated, this is a war game!  As in the real world, those that win a war determine the future of the territory gained.  In this game, the territory gained is the area around the fortress with the highest POI.  You'll not change human behaviour either within the game nor in the real world by 'wishing it was so'.

My suggestion would be those that have badged can no longer recieve poi bonus this would allow them to continue but will balance game for others

Then force people to join a new server once they win?

That happens already. 

It's the rate of funding that decides the early success also the level of participation in alliances. 

So a full alliance and several wings heavily funded moved to the rear or the map or just left in place is still a contender. And how long should the poi throttle be active? Not forever....

Expensive and violent wars are assured .....

IF they are not convinced to start a new server.?

Now in that scenario if defense artillery had much quicker calibration times....?

It's a new game.

This is a War Game, but it is not real world, its a game and as such it should be treated that way as a game.  Once you win (Destroy Fortress) you are the Victor and have won the game.

If the rules do not change to prevent Dictatorships the game will go away on its own. I have decided to not enrich EA until they change the rules.  Gamerdruid were you ever in a Real World War?  I think not because there is no winner in Real War, just some people left to clean up the mess.

And ironically the alliance system is able to be run by what ever policy you imagine.

Like a government almost. There is safety in numbers. Get some people to be social and strategize with as it is the easist way to play yet obviously the hardest thing to apply.

The big alliances fund to reach the center first and accept players who alone understand that narrow and relatively expensive strategy.

There is a lot of game past the first 60 days and a lot of intelligent strategies and self defined progress  to imagine. 

If you are after the same thing as the bigger alliances learn their tactics.

i remember we chat about that topic long time ago on my first account....

and i think both sides got some rights hire....

alliance who is a stronger one and win war and the serwer should lead a world till they will be play....

but the think wrong hire is... lots of players who want to fight for 2nd  or 3rd badge mostly dont have chance to fight vs bigboys protecter thier own ships in sec alliances

there will be nice if somethink change and let others have more chance to get  fights for 2nd or 3-4-5th badges also....

The winners are dropped some levels and moved from the center.

The norm use to be....usually a trailing alliance who is in the position diplomatically to take advantage make their move. Often some dedicated wing alliance. 

Or the change was enough to tip the balance of power and a rival alliance would position themselves. Then idea was concede or risk a costly war. 

You still had to be organized to challenge the fortress.

You could hope to badge without opposition if a lot of players simply quit but you couldn't count on that.

The top alliances are unchallenged due to their multi alliance defense.

A challenger is usually a nonaggressive wing by any other name. By far the surest way to badge after the first once uncontested. And a strategy decided on early and under the circumstances a good one..

So without new alliances being formed you know the next 5 or 6 badge alliances without fail. 

That issue is bad only as long as you are not in TOP.

When you get there all becomes fine^^

But seriously, when it's not clear what it's about, it's always about the money...

Just give badges for lower fortress kills.

Maybe some other achievement badges.