Forum Discussion
I don`t agree on your point. No weapon should be a MUST. And Eva8 is perfectly fine, but its like 100x time worst than a mastiff. That is the problem.
You get 8 damage with Eva8 from any distance further 5-10 meters, yet with Mastiff, you get 90 damage, 70 damage, 60 damage, and you get 52 damage from 50 meter.
The picture i post is from a distance kinda 50 meters, not 20 for sure.
And i don`t see how lower they range, almost everyone compare(about Mastiff ridiculous range) will hurt them.
They are and should be a close range weapons, not snipe them for a medium distance for big damage, and without much skill, just spam and get the damage, because of the big range.
@LordloshBang Well you've proven that the Mastiff is effective at a greater range than a shotgun should have. That holds very little meaning in a game where a wingman beats snipers at long range and a smg (R-99) is used as a high rate of fire assault rifle.
Even when those 50 damage shots landed the rate of fire was too low to compete with anything. It's a surprisingly high number but a joke in comparison to any gun in the game that isn't a shotgun.
If you want to compare the shotguns then isn't the Eva-8 a low skill spamming shotgun while the Mastiff takes SOME skill to use effectively? In the first video you see the player bobbing,weaving, and sliding while using the R-99 but he stands perfectly still 90% of the time he uses the Mastiff. Seems to imply that he can't land those shots on the move like he can with any other weapon.
- 6 years ago
@heme725 wrote:@LordloshBang Well you've proven that the Mastiff is effective at a greater range than a shotgun should have. That holds very little meaning in a game where a wingman beats snipers at long range and a smg (R-99) is used as a high rate of fire assault rifle.
Even when those 50 damage shots landed the rate of fire was too low to compete with anything. It's a surprisingly high number but a joke in comparison to any gun in the game that isn't a shotgun.
If you want to compare the shotguns then isn't the Eva-8 a low skill spamming shotgun while the Mastiff takes SOME skill to use effectively? In the first video you see the player bobbing,weaving, and sliding while using the R-99 but he stands perfectly still 90% of the time he uses the Mastiff. Seems to imply that he can't land those shots on the move like he can with any other weapon.
With Eva8 from a distance you will get 8 damage at best, while with Mastiff you will get 52, and Mastiff have more range on his pellets.
Eva8 for me is perfectly balanced, and all other shotgun should be balanced towards her. She is good at the right distance, the damage is good, but not too high, as it should be.
Mastiff is a complete beast. And it has high movement speed during ADS, and good luck on kinda close encounters, but not as close for hipfire to even have a chance with AR with that slow MS during ADS.
With an R99 and R301 you have to aim and there is a high chance to dodge if not all, most of the bullets, you don`t have that chance even against a bad aimer with mastiff.
- 6 years ago@LordloshBang You do have to aim with Mastiff.
- 6 years ago@Sir_Named Apparently not but you do with the R99.. 😆
- 6 years ago
@LordloshBang The Eva-8 is fine but the gun is so weak that most players don't bother carrying it unless they have to. If shotguns are balanced around the Eva-8 then they might as well be removed from the game since nobody will use them.
Using the Mastiff will always mean slowing down since aiming down the sights is mandatory on that gun. There's no way to spin this. Mastiff users aren't strafing around bullets as it isn't a gun that can be used evasively. It's best used to finish off opponents, or at close range with cover to hide behind.
- 6 years ago
The problem with the mastiff is there 1 shot you at point Blank range but any Legend with low profile seems to take 12 damage unless you shoved it on their nose and can we please have melee with weapons equipped a smashing someone with the butt the of a shotgun it a legitimate combat technique
- 6 years ago@heme725 That is not true. I just quick scope and flick with the mastiff and I don't slow down or stop slide jumping around people at all. It is definitely more powerful than the pk before its legendary upgrade, as it hits for the same damage as the choked pk at range, is far more consistent due to it's better spread, and does not rechamber after every shot. Not to mention it has the most op sights in the game.
- 6 years ago@SadLifeline6991 Don’t know where you’re getting that, but it is kind of... false.
It’s worse than the PK, but if you don’t believe that, then why do you think they swapped the PK and Mastiff?
It also definitely doesn’t have the same range. - 6 years ago
@SadLifeline6991 Really? Many on the forums argued the PK was stronger than the Mastiff before they switched positions in the care package. It was known for landing 80 damage shots at range (without choke) while the Mastiff has been shown to land 52 at best.
The PK was equally good whether hipfired or ADS so there was no need to slow down a bit when using the gun while the Mastiff requires aiming down the sights. I'm not even sure the Mastiff does more damage at point blank than pre-buff PK.
Lastly the spread should make it incredibly inconsistent. You should be able to deal damage easily but if you're slightly off then you won't deal high damage.
- 6 years ago@Sir_Named the gold pk now is not the same as the nerfed pk. Also the reason I believe it got swapped out was because it was able to two shot body shot you or one shot you after a shield break as well as having decent range with the choke, even after they nerfed it. And their were a ton of complaints every season about it. The mastiff also has decent range for a shotgun, can two shot or one shot you on body, does not need to rechamber after firing. The only downside is that to tighten the spread you have to ads, but because it's a shotgun you can do that will moving, jumping and firing, quickscoping it like it's a sniper. It is more forgiving then the pre legendary pk, with all of the same strengths that made it good. How is it not better?
- 6 years ago@heme725 you do not need to slow down at all with the mastiff you can just ads the second you fire while flicking to the target in the air, while sliding, cut strafing whatever. Plenty of people did the same thing with the pk by scoping in the second they fired to ensure they didn't get a fail of 8 damage on the pk. You end up doing the same pk dance with the mastiff, but the mastiff has a better rate of fire and is far more forgiving on a low damage or even missed shot.
- 6 years ago@SadLifeline6991 The PK could be used in hip-fire, had basically the same damage, and more range. Plus, it’s easier to get a good shot on the PK than the Mastiff.
The rechamber thing is minor, and the time can be reduced with a bolt.
Quick scoping is still worse than just hip-fire.
The Mastiff is a little forgiving, giving you some minor damage if you are off, but it doesn’t change the fact that the PK was better in almost every way. - 6 years ago
Here’s a good example.
https://youtu.be/0lQE8u5-a8A
From about 4:29-6:00, TGM uses the Mastiff and does terrible damage. Consistently hitting for 10-30 damage. - 6 years ago@Sir_Named That does seem odd, as I've hit for higher damage from farther away with it, and tgm is much much better than me. It could just be poor hitreg and poor servers as the last legend he 1v1'd def should have died. Does he have multiple clips complaining about its low damage or was that just a one off? Because you could also pull clips of the pk consistently hitting low dmg shots from previous seasons, but it wouldn't change it spot for being one of the best cq guns in the game.
- 6 years ago@SadLifeline6991 I don’t think he really complains about it, I was just watching the video and thought of this thread.
I’ll see if there are more clips.
It’s true that there are probably plenty of PK vids with low damage, but this was an entire like 2 min fight where the Mastiff kind of sucked.
I’m guessing it’s because TGM hip-fires a lot in the clip, which is extremely bad. - 6 years ago
Mastiff is completely broken i don`t know how you can defend anything OP/broken and changes they are making to the game, even tho they are terrible.
But you can continue be the white horse for Respawn.
I said it many time, shootguns should be balanced towards Eva8.
PK was also incredibly strong and deserved nerf.
Many top streamers were hating on the PK(like Diegosauer) and said its broken/OP even after all the nerfs, which tells you quite a story how broken it was at the beginning.Mastiff is now a must, and now other weapon in the game atm is a must, except the Mastiff, which tells you how brokenly OP is it.
And the main problem is how easy is to land your shots.
Its a noob friendly weapon.
- 6 years ago
@LordloshBang Every gun is easy to use except the Wingman. I assume that Mastiffis used because it feels fun to down players with and its a good clean-up gun.
Melt armor with the R-99 and finish with Mastiff.
As for the Eva-8 it's worthless long-range, trash mid-range and competitive (at best) close-range. Inferior to the R-99, R301, Havoc, Hemlock, G7, Prowler, Wingman, Alternator, RE45, Flatline, Spitfire and maybe the p2020.
That isn't well balanced unless you dont want shotguns to be competitive at all.
@LordloshBang I may be misunderstanding you when you say balance it like the Eva-8 so I'll ask what you want the Mastiff to be capable of.
- 6 years ago
I think Eva8 is perfectly balance towards the gun an the TTK in the game.
Mastiff is not. This is my opinion.
Shootgun should be finishing weapon, and should be useful really at close range. Every other range they should be ineffective.
Mastiff is easy to use because of the big radius of its pellet.
You don`t even need a good aim to land most of your shots at someone.So many times my opponent can barely land a shot on me with his SMG/AR, and then he pull out his shotgun and im dead in a shot or two.
And a lot of people with bad aim are doing great with the wingman, because of a lot of factors, like easy to spam, because of the ammo and you can waste it as much as you want, high damage and so on.
- 6 years ago@LordloshBang If people can’t hit you with their main weapon, and swap to the Mastiff, that’s a lot of time for you to laser them.
Similar thing with the Wingman. If they can’t hit you often, then take the opportunity to shoot them or reposition. - 6 years ago
Yeah but this is not a 1vs1 game, you know ?
And unless your pro(and even they didn`t do it that often), its not that easy to down someone with 1 mag, unless it has full purple attachments, and still.
Mastiff atm is a must, and no weapon should be a must. Its way too OP for me.
You may disagree, but you won`t change my opinion. A lot of pro players admit it.
Both PK before and the Mastiff are way too strong, compare to the rest and when we take TTK of the game.
- 6 years ago@LordloshBang There’s quite a few guns that have enough in the mag to down an enemy in close range.
Especially with purple mags, it’d be a little odd if you didn’t down an enemy in close range. (Or get downed yourself) - 6 years ago@Sir_Named Totally agree. Also at a range where the mastiff drops off to say 50 damage by the time you get a second shot off you would have already done over 100 damage with the R99 for example. Plus with the Mastiff you have to ads where as the R99 you can hip fire and spray like a sweat.
Just supply drop them both, add a new smg and the game will be way more fun than this repetitive meta. - 6 years ago
I guess this is the reason every pro players are must using Mastiff as a second weapon, instead of a second SMG or AR, right ? :D
Nice joke tho ...
No one even come close to the power of the mastiff in close, and even not so close, which is quite a problem.
Also with that stupidly OP weapon, you 1 shot a downed player, no other weapon have that power, which is ridiculous.
- 6 years ago@LordloshBang That’s a pretty wild exaggeration.
I watched a good chunk of a tournament game, there weren’t that many Mastiffs. There were a few, but they weren’t as picked as the R-99 or Wingman. Heck, there were even some people carrying EVA-8s, (COL, whoever they are), and one or two carrying alternators.
In really close range, it’s good, but again, it’s a shotgun. When you go a little further out, it’s still kind of useful, but other weapons are just far more versatile.
A downed player is basically just a stationary dummy at that point. It’s really easy to get close and use the Mastiff at it’s full potential. Not much you can do anyway, the EVA-8 would probably take only three shots, or two/four if you use doubletap. - 6 years ago
Maybe because at tournament, you can`t get all the loot you want, because its distributed between the players. But the moment they see a Mastiff they pick it. Don`t know what tournament you were watching. But 99,99% of the time, they are either r99 or wingman with a mastiff.
If they get a Eva8 its because they did not found Mastiff yet. Everyone drop Eva8 for Mastiff, everyone.
Saying otherwise just show how little Pro players you have been watching.
Even the best Eva8 player is dropping her for a mastiff - Rogue.
And he is usually use the weapon he like, aka R301, instead of R99 for example. He love Eva8, but even he admit that she is way worst compare to mastiff.
Same with alternator, they wear it, because they didn`t get a better version, aka R99 and R301. 99,99% of the pros are dropping alternator for R301, and R301 for R99. Its like a tier guns.
I got no problem with tier guns, but not with OP/Broken ones, like the stupidly easy to use and incredible powerful mastiff.
And its not good in close range, its a must. Its make you wear it, otherwise you are in a huge disadvantage, even if you are the better player.
No weapon beat Mastiff close range. Most pro are empty the mag with R99 or Wingman and just switch and eliminate whole teams with it, which speaks for itself.
Most streamers/pros are saying the same, that is OP. Don`t know why we even stretch the discussion that far. You may disagree, but thats your opinion, i don`t want to change it, just like you won`t change my opinion, that is completely easy to use and completely broken.
And you are obviously not objective. If you down a player and want to kill him fast(either Lifeline in his team, or wanna get ammo or armor swap ot etc), your best bet is the mastiff, its one shot. Otherwise you are in a bad situation, because you won`t be able to kill him with 1 mag, if he got a shield and rotate.
Again my points are no shootgun should be able to do more than 70 damage per whole shot, and no shootgun should have that kind of the mastiff range on such a big distance and able to do such high damage.
I got no problem with your opinion, but you can`t change my mind. Mastiff is too powerful for the current TTK of the game.
- 6 years ago@LordloshBang
Tournament loot distribution isn’t really the problem here. You can see many, many R-99s and Wingmans, so that’s probably not it.
https://youtu.be/Wn1TZcX-eGA
Here. I watched the first game, (not all since I find it boring), and there were definitely some Mastiffs, just not 99.99% of all people used them. More like 10-20%. Even in the final ring, there were probably about equal EVA-8s and Mastiffs. (And it’s definitely not loot distribution.)
No more than 70 damage per shot from a shotgun would destroy the Mastiff. It wouldn’t be viable at that point.
You are kind of overrating the Mastiff’s range, as well. It really doesn’t have that much range.
What are “most pros”? And why did they say it?
Sure, to shave some half seconds off finishing someone, you can use the Mastiff, but that’s not really a major advantage.
Community Highlights
- EA_Mako3 months ago
Community Manager
Recent Discussions
- 24 minutes ago
- 5 hours ago
- 21 hours ago