Battlefield 6 is terrible
Stop drastically changing maps for bs reasons because they’re becoming unrecognizable. Y'all kept firestorm the same but fisted golmud railway and grand bazaar six ways to sunday. They’re not returni...
Forum Discussion
There's no way you think BF4 Golmund is good. It's abysmal and the BF6 team did a fantastic job making it playable.
Take off the nostalgia goggles for a minute.
There’s no way you think bf4 golmud is bad 🤡 the bf6 version is worse. Imagine being you and being wrong. You sound like a good complicit little EA fanboy.
The playable area in bf4 golmud was much better. In a typical 800 v 80 ticket server the destruction was fine and the cover lasted for that time frame. A lot of golmud hate comes from infantry only players that stayed in metro/locker. Combined arms/ vehicles players loved golmud.
There's a lot more clutter and random cover in the new bf6 version and they cut back the playable area. With how bad the netcode, player visibility, and lack of recoil, its hard to cover some distances or check every corner. All the buildings should be fully destructible to rubble piles
Agree 100%
A majority of the community thinks BF4 Golmund is horrible and many are surprised it's good in this game.
This is information you are also able to gleam if you lived in reality.
Your majority of 3 people isn’t the majority of the community and was always a very active map especially in rented servers. There were plenty of golmud 24/7 maps, your argument is baseless bud. If you’re arguing that changing everything in the map and adding unnecessary clutter is “better” then you haven’t been playing battlefield long enough.
The poor little vehicle player when infantry has cover to use.
Playing since 1942, btw. No one cares.
