Age-related dialogue within romances not optional?
How come it is possible to express lack of experience via the dialogue wheel, but not age within romances with companions? The game, which is more or less an rpg, seems to explicitly decide your Rook's age for you instead of leaving it vague.
Can the option either to remove age related dialogue tags or to allude to your Rooks desired age be potentially added into the game, or at the very least, the romances? I don't normally mind so much when my character is referred to being younger or older than they are, but I went in to romance Emmrich after having created an older looking Rook specifically for him, only for him to consistently refer to my Rook as a "young woman". Harding also comments on the gap, implying the difference is large enough to raise eyebrows.
It really breaks the immersion and ideally the choice to be able to choose your Rook's age would be there to avoid this, but just patching out these age related tags entirely or having the option to choose age from within the dialogue wheel itself would be good.
It would be nice to have the option to rp someone who is of a similar age to Emmrich instead of an age gap being forced on your character. I think most people don't mind age differences, but it's unusual and disappointing that you don't get a say in whether or not your romance with Emmrich has one, in an rpg. An unromanced Emmrich ends up with Strife anyway, who is an older character. The same option should be extended to Rook or have the age of Rook be left vague enough and exclude this heavily immersion-breaking aspect of the game.
Inquisition handled the potential age range for the Inquisitor well, and the same should be done for Veilguard.