Forum Discussion
@Iron_Guard8I guess we'll have to see how pvz 3 turns out and what they decide to do with the series going forward depending on how well it does.
I really wish the sentiment on the redhead video of giving the game to the community or Atleast respected members to make changes could take off since it seems like the playerbase genuinely cares and it takes little effort on the publishers besides raking the cash it could bring from somebody seeing support and deciding to buy the game or its packs.
I know they've said its not apparently as simple as changing a line of code but they still had to do something with the game to make the anti cheat work and fix other issues. If the community is willing to essentially fix certain things themselves for free then why not? Ea could only benefit by making more money from non mobile pvz players and its not like anyones apparently working on the game in that manner from what they're telling us.
My gw3 would be the gnomes being more prevalent and thus causing time to get messed up to use it as a glorified excuse to bring in old maps.
they will happily fix the banning issue because it stops players from spending money, portal rotation likely wont change as its just QOL for achievements unfortunately
- stukapooka2 years agoLegend
@ShremmyIt's sad because they could probably make a bit of money off of fixing the portal since gw2 would be easier to recommend if it had newer content and people would likely buy the game for it.
However this is probably the truth. Its why they're so quick to fix rux and other issues but somehow unable to actually change the portal.
About Plants vs. Zombies™ Franchise Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 10 hours ago