"herd_nerfer;c-2416703" wrote:
"Antario;c-2416701" wrote:
"herd_nerfer;c-2416674" wrote:
"Antario;c-2416634" wrote:
"herd_nerfer;c-2416532" wrote:
SHHHH!!!!!.gif
seriously_be_quiet.jpg
what_is_WRONG_with_you.png
Having the old disks in the new conquest only diminish your chances to get the much needed new disks like AA and VA. This is not right and needs to be fixed asap.
Sure, but ZA and Entrenched help significantly with certain feats - so even if they're not supposed to be there, it's a benefit. Four disks aren't going to change the odds of getting a favored combo so significantly that you won't be able to do it.
You are missing my point. More disk variants means less the chance to get one you want AND also less chance to get a decent one. Sure, Entrenched and ZA are good, but there are three different variants of them. The chance to get a green or blue disk or more than one Entrenched disk are also dimished because of the variety of disks now.
I'm through sector 2 now, so far I got one entrenched (grey), one ZA (grey), no AA and no CE, but tons of other useless disks. Not a great start.
I'm not missing your point - I understand what you're saying. I still contend that adding 4 disks to the pool of available disks isn't going to affect your odds as badly as you might think. It does reduce your chances of getting your specific desired disk combo - I acknowledge that - but RNG is RNG - you could still have gotten nothing but trash disks regardless.
It's a drag when that happens and I hope you get the disks you're looking for.
Why are you defending CG's fault by saying it's RNG...? Do you work for them?