Why make conquest worst and then ask for money to "improve" the game mode and make it better. This is the worst money grab I've ever seen I won't be paying for either of these "battle passes" if you can even call it that. At least make the battle pass last 3 months like most other games, the fact that you're trying to milk each conquest for as much money as they can is just sad. This game has sadly become all about the money and zero about the gameplay. I simply won't pay money to "improve" a broken game mode that you guys broke. First conquest was the most fun and had many choices of data disks. Oh but that's right, you want peoples money, you don't want them to have fun.Revert the changes, worst conquest yet...

The thing is this conquest is so horrible, the disks are so bad, and the feats are so repetitive that I would not want to spend money to do better b/c I can’t stand playing it the little that I have.

I actually want to spend money on this game, but they don't have anything that doesn't seem like a bad deal. I mean, anything...I give HotUtils $10 a month for the game. I'd rather give that $ to CG. But what they have done with Conquest is just make a game mode I just don't care about.

I think its cool how dots / thermal data disks are useful for once, and how people are creatively using them

I think CG made a mistake to raise the bar for conquest postmortem. Just imagine if the current conquest would have been the first conquest introduced. I'm pretty much sure there will be much less people complaining because there is simply no nothing better to compare with. Now everyone got used to get red crate without much effort and many won't get it this time. Of course people are upset.

"Antario;c-2313035" wrote:I think CG made a mistake to raise the bar for conquest postmortem. Just imagine if the current conquest would have been the first conquest introduced. I'm pretty much sure there will be much less people complaining because there is simply no nothing better to compare with. Now everyone got used to get red crate without much effort and many won't get it this time. Of course people are upset. People have been burning the house down since the 1st changes were made. It is far from about the red crate.Players feel that if they are going to be beta-tested and told they are being heard, then their input and gameplay are vested. When people feel vested, they have higher expectations in products. This is particularly true when it comes how well that product meets their expectations. You may have had this point in mind with your comment, but didn't quite state it like this: CG has a PR problem with Conquest and how they unveil refine it. Had it been Conquest version 3 on day 1, and they made no more changes and said, "enjoy" there would be far less complaining.

Conquest ruined "let's make the game mode terrible and ask for money to improve gameplay"

Jovian9
New Spectator
4 years ago
The thing is this conquest is so horrible, the disks are so bad, and the feats are so repetitive that I would not want to spend money to do better b/c I can’t stand playing it the little that I have.
Mephisto_style
4 years ago
I actually want to spend money on this game, but they don't have anything that doesn't seem like a bad deal. I mean, anything...

I give HotUtils $10 a month for the game. I'd rather give that $ to CG.

But what they have done with Conquest is just make a game mode I just don't care about.
NotRealUltra
Seasoned Newcomer
4 years ago
I think its cool how dots / thermal data disks are useful for once, and how people are creatively using them
AntarioXP
4 years ago
I think CG made a mistake to raise the bar for conquest postmortem. Just imagine if the current conquest would have been the first conquest introduced. I'm pretty much sure there will be much less people complaining because there is simply no nothing better to compare with.

Now everyone got used to get red crate without much effort and many won't get it this time. Of course people are upset.
Mephisto_style
4 years ago
"Antario;c-2313035" wrote:
I think CG made a mistake to raise the bar for conquest postmortem. Just imagine if the current conquest would have been the first conquest introduced. I'm pretty much sure there will be much less people complaining because there is simply no nothing better to compare with.

Now everyone got used to get red crate without much effort and many won't get it this time. Of course people are upset.

People have been burning the house down since the 1st changes were made. It is far from about the red crate.

Players feel that if they are going to be beta-tested and told they are being heard, then their input and gameplay are vested. When people feel vested, they have higher expectations in products. This is particularly true when it comes how well that product meets their expectations.

You may have had this point in mind with your comment, but didn't quite state it like this: CG has a PR problem with Conquest and how they unveil refine it. Had it been Conquest version 3 on day 1, and they made no more changes and said, "enjoy" there would be far less complaining.
Rebmes
4 years ago
Honestly they should be paying US to "play" Conquest at this point, not the other way around.

I would definitely buy a pass but I can't say I'm enjoying the game mode anymore, so I won't.

Going for a full clear, and what a tremendous grind.
AntarioXP
4 years ago
"Mephisto_style;c-2313038" wrote:
"Antario;c-2313035" wrote:
I think CG made a mistake to raise the bar for conquest postmortem. Just imagine if the current conquest would have been the first conquest introduced. I'm pretty much sure there will be much less people complaining because there is simply no nothing better to compare with.

Now everyone got used to get red crate without much effort and many won't get it this time. Of course people are upset.

People have been burning the house down since the 1st changes were made. It is far from about the red crate.

Players feel that if they are going to be beta-tested and told they are being heard, then their input and gameplay are vested. When people feel vested, they have higher expectations in products. This is particularly true when it comes how well that product meets their expectations.

You may have had this point in mind with your comment, but didn't quite state it like this: CG has a PR problem with Conquest and how they unveil refine it. Had it been Conquest version 3 on day 1, and they made no more changes and said, "enjoy" there would be far less complaining.

Bottom line is: never introduce a new game mode, which feels like a cakewalk. Just make it almost impossible to complete right off the bat. And then gradually reduce the level of difficulty as the game progresses, because you should never underestimate the creativity of the player base. They did it well with the raids and tb. I'm not sure how they could mess it up so badly with conquest.
Rebmes
4 years ago
You don't have to complete each battle 40 times in TB / raids.

Difficulty, people can overcome.
zatho-legit
4 years ago
"Ultra;c-2313032" wrote:
I think its cool how dots / thermal data disks are useful for once, and how people are creatively using them

That is true but it is not cool that is is completely RnG and luck dependent if you are able to get these disks or not. Without them Conquest is even worse. I think they should give you at least a purple disk to start and build your strategy around it.
IL168
4 years ago
From what I see they are squeezing very hard for the money, company like that won’t survive long.