Error with STH's Taunt

Yes both ability STOP him from havering. It is working as it should.

"Trolldanoob;826355" wrote:
Yes both ability STOP him from havering. It is working as it should.

That's not the issue.

The issue referred to is a bug: if Han fails to taunt due to a debuff, be it Shock or Buff Block (Immunity, too used to Buff Block) he should not gain the secondary effect of the taunt, which would go away if the taunt was dispelled, but is still applied if the taunt isn't.

"Zach325;826365" wrote:
The ability is broken into parts. The taunt is one thing while the TM gaining is another. The taunt not going up and allies still gaining TM is WAI and is not a bug. Please do a little research first as this has been brought up multiple times in the past and a little close reading could go a long way.

Then why does the TM Gain go away when you Dispel the Taunt?

It's a bug and it's known by the devs

"Zach325;826365" wrote:
The ability is broken into parts. The taunt is one thing while the TM gaining is another. The taunt not going up and allies still gaining TM is WAI and is not a bug. Please do a little research first as this has been brought up multiple times in the past and a little close reading could go a long way.

The OP is talking about how Han still gives TM from being attacked even the taunt doesn't go through because of ability block or shock. If Han got his taunt off cleanly but was dispelled then the TM gain for others would stop and it wouldn't make sense for both of those situations to be correct.

It has been reported as a bug and dev team is supposedly looking at it

https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/58960/the-bugs-bin-update-12-15#latest

In the 9/28 section

Abilities - Stormtrooper Han's Draw Fire Ability behaves differently when Shocked compared to being Dispelled

If the taunt itself is concidered both a buff and a positive status effect (buffs being a subset of positive status effects) and the TM granting effect is concidered a positive status effect (but not a buff) then it makes perfect sense that StHan doesn't gain the taunt but still grants TM if he's affected by buff immunity, while QGJ can still dispel both effects (taunt as well as TM granting). In that case everything works according to the wording of the skill descriptions.

The bug list mentions StHan's 'draw fire' while he's affected by shock. I'm not sure what exactly it refers to.

"Waqui;826534" wrote:
If the taunt itself is concidered both a buff and a positive status effect (buffs being a subset of positive status effects) and the TM granting effect is concidered a positive status effect (but not a buff) then it makes perfect sense that StHan doesn't gain the taunt but still grants TM if he's affected by buff immunity, while QGJ can still dispel both effects (taunt as well as TM granting). In that case everything works according to the wording of the skill descriptions.

The bug list mentions StHan's 'draw fire' while he's affected by shock. I'm not sure what exactly it refers to.

Shock includes buff immunity.

Why this is a bug no matter how you want to look at.

As you said QGJ, or any dispeller, can dispel the taunt and the TM give stops. Well guess what if STH is shocked or has buff immunity on him and tries to taunt you can't later dispel the TM give. So one way or another it is broke

Either dispel should not stop the TM give or Shock/Buff immunity should stop the TM give.

"Alsend_Drake;826370" wrote:

"Zach325;826365" wrote:
The ability is broken into parts. The taunt is one thing while the TM gaining is another. The taunt not going up and allies still gaining TM is WAI and is not a bug. Please do a little research first as this has been brought up multiple times in the past and a little close reading could go a long way.

Then why does the TM Gain go away when you Dispel the Taunt?

QGJ dispels all positive status effects — not only buffs. Hence it makes perfect sense that he can dispell both effects. Skills that only dispel buffs like Baze's two dispels, however, should only remove the taunt and not the second effect. If it removes both, then something is not working as it's described in skill descriptions