GAC scoring

If you lost despite having an extra 40 banners from first-try bonuses, that means your battles were
U L T R A S L O P P Y
and that's why you lost.

Also, you can earn 66 banners in the fleet battle pretty easily, so your opponent probably made up a bit of ground there.

the guy who couldn’t beat my teams on the first attempt is way worse at managing a roster than me because he lost battles when I didn’t. This game is about winning battles nor awarding people who can’t win thrm

"srwhitewvu;c-2015903" wrote:
This game is about winning battles nor awarding people who can’t win thrm

False. It's about getting the most banners. You got fewer banners, because, again:

U L T R A S L O P P Y S A U C E

so you lost. That's all there is to it.

"srwhitewvu;c-2015903" wrote:
the guy who couldn’t beat my teams on the first attempt is way worse at managing a roster than me because he lost battles when I didn’t. This game is about winning battles nor awarding people who can’t win thrm

So you're saying someone who uses 4 people on offense should not get more points for the fight then someone who needed all 5 people to win the fight? If someone is capable of using undersized squads multiple times on offense that seems like a good sign that they know how to manage their roster.

No I’m saying if someone loses on the first time twice and the other person doesn’t lose once, the person who lost twice should not have a chance to win if they win an equal amount of battles. The person who lost twice lost and therefore is not as good.

"srwhitewvu;c-2015915" wrote:
No I’m saying if someone loses on the first time twice and the other person doesn’t lose once, the person who lost twice should not have a chance to win if they win an equal amount of battles. The person who lost twice lost and therefore is not as good.

The person who lost twice has a better understanding of the scoring system, and is therefore better.

I don't know how its even possible that you lost while clearing everything on the first try when your opponent lost two battles. That's impressively bad play by you.

First of all either of us cleared. Both of us couldn’t beat the other’s darth Revan. Second of all, the goal of this game is to win matches. The scoring system should not be such that someone can beat someone when they lose the match. Under the current scoring system, someone could win the match with one toon left and less than full health and protection and score 51 points. Then the other person could face the same team lose the match leaving the team with one toon with little health left, they can then use one toon and take out the last team and score 54 points. This is total nonsense as clearly the player that actually won on the first try performed better than the guy that didn’t. The system rewards mediocrity. I like systems that reward winning. It is a joke.

"srwhitewvu;c-2016019" wrote:
First of all either of us cleared. Both of us couldn’t beat the other’s darth Revan. Second of all, the goal of this game is to win matches. The scoring system should not be such that someone can beat someone when they lose the match. Under the current scoring system, someone could win the match with one toon left and less than full health and protection and score 51 points. Then the other person could face the same team lose the match leaving the team with one toon with little health left, they can then use one toon and take out the last team and score 54 points. This is total nonsense as clearly the player that actually won on the first try performed better than the guy that didn’t. The system rewards mediocrity. I like systems that reward winning. It is a joke.

Wrong max score on 2nd try is 44 points

Also, I didn’t play that sloppily, I averaged 59.4 points on my 5 wins so there is that