Should the "Raids Rewards" be reviewed ?

"Big_Boss;346249" wrote:


Dude there are guilds made of 50 whales and you think they are happy they have to out spend each other?There better off in a f2p guild that is dedicated and he/she can constantly rank #1

"Akster;346205" wrote:

"Darthdaddy81;346194" wrote:
If the only(nearly only) way to get rewards is to pay, its pay to win. And I won't do it. I paid more for this game than any console or PC game already.

Shipments.

It is just as pay to win as refreshing energy to do more battles to get gear faster just like before.

Until the update fully hits we do not know to what extent the difference will be.

They have to outspend people how? A lot of the complaints in the forums are a confusion of personal currency and guild currency only used to summon the raid.

When it comes to dealing damage to the rancor, which is what the extra ranking rewards are, you get 5 attempts. If this can be refreshed with crystals or not has not been stated, same as if you can revive characters with crystals, whcih since you cant do this in GW it is likely you can not do this in the raid.

"TheTherion7;346259" wrote:
Pay to advance faster IS practically pay to win, as we 1. dont live forever, 2. have lives, 3. have limited resources (time, $, physical and mental stamina). And this is exactly what game companies try to exploit.

So yeah i understand the monetization of games nowdays, but what most players ask from these games, is a better more fair less greedy set up, that will probably still make the same income due to increase of new players. But most developers are afraid of failure and try the easy fast grabbing way.

Practically? Either it is or is not. You will get your gear X arena team a little later than other people will, the extent of this being or problem or not is unknown, and peoples outrage is of face value merit, of which we do not have all the information on. Yes, some peoples concerns are valid about certain things, others in my personal opinion, are not.

A few weeks ago I started a poll asking if the level cap increase should have been delayed until the balance patch. It ended up being the most lopsided poll with many votes ever seen on this forum: 5 to 1 voted to delay the level cap increase, with almost 400 votes.
This poll will eclipse it. I don't know ANYONE who is happy with this arrangement, and it only underscores how badly CG needs to get better in touch with their players and implement a beta test program.

Oh my, I am really the minority here.

I dont think it's a massive gap, though i do think if they make GvG then you guys will complain A LOT more than the current situation.

"Baggodi;346375" wrote:
If the goal of guilds is team building then ranking rewards within the team is divisive and self defeating.

This. I feel like the system can be exploited, and that's where teamwork falls apart. Guilds should compete with other guilds if anything.

But we'll see how it turns out I guess. Might not stay around depending on the result

With each update this game keeps going down hill. I'm really trying to find something to hold onto to keep me playing. I love star wars and I love the turn based combat but I feel like they are just shoving more and more pay to win schemes into this game and it makes it so hard to keep wanting to play.

What on earth is this?
Encouraging "in-fighting" within the guild?

I must as well create a guild with only 20 top players and so we're always guaranteed top 20 rewards.
Please this is NOT the first time your content is designed to KICK ITSELF IN IT'S FOOT.
So what's the point of filling my guild then?

Not to mention your clustering of heroes at cantina made other holotable rewards less useful and inflated the currency.
(An example of making content that is self defeating)

Great job. Can I clap for you?

"Corndog131;346575" wrote:
I sure hope EA reads this poll. If 99% of the players think its' wrong, then it's probably not wise to go in that direction.

They didn't pay attention to the last poll about the protection changes with was one of the most one sided polls I've ever seen.

"anduincolfer;346564" wrote:
What on earth is this?
Encouraging "in-fighting" within the guild?

I must as well create a guild with only 20 top players and so we're always guaranteed top 20 rewards.
Please this is NOT the first time your content is designed to KICK ITSELF IN IT'S FOOT.
So what's the point of filling my guild then?

The bolded is easy. You fill the "bottom" of your guild with a bunch of f2p peons you get to do all the heavy lifting, while you sit at the top and collect all the rewards they worked so hard to help acquire. It's what team work and friendship is all about!

I'm a p2p (small fish), currrently the largest contributor to my guild and I don't think they should have implemented a competitive system in guilds... especially when they say it should be for collaboration... like they have