Forum Discussion
6 years ago
"Talifer;c-1817259" wrote:
I wish they would just be honest and admit this is nothing to do with the Sith raid but the realisation that huge turn meter gains are damaging to balance going forward. I'm sure most people would be more understanding, as with the HK-47 leadership changes, if the motives were less obviously contrived.
I also wish they would look at this from the point of view of those with sub G11/12 squads. I'm sure G12 resistance teams are still viable but my squad is not at those dizzy heights. So I have 2 choices a) leave my resistance team to rot and write off all the investment so far b) pile more resources into this team to bring them inline with the expected results the testing is suggesting they are capable of.
I would like to see refunds for the squad as a whole, the change in leadership effects more than just the leadership resources itself. This squad no longer does the job I invested in it for, I would rather invest elsewhere e.g. First Order, Nightsisters, Bounty Hunters who haven't been changed (yet).
I agree on all but the last part. No way to tell yet if/when/how new kit will be useful next. It SEEMS to have promise.
On the "sub G11/g12 squads" comment - I think those are very rare. Mine personally was g10 and I had no incentive to change him because he did his job of killing slower G12 teams just great. Probably another indication of him being a little broken. ;)
About SWGOH General Discussion
Discuss and share your feedback on Star Wars: Galaxy of Heroes with fellow players.
77,704 PostsLatest Activity: 9 hours agoRelated Posts
Recent Discussions
- 3 hours ago
- 5 hours ago