Forum Discussion
"Monel;c-2076722" wrote:
"Treeburner;c-2076634" wrote:
"Monel;c-2076420" wrote:
"FurytheOriginal;c-2076375" wrote:
Well the devs did state they would include it in the next update but then changed the post to say a "future" update
Apparently they forgot
That's the thing about the future it's always sometime later. One can never forget something that hasn't happened.
I forgot I made plans with someone for next week and double booked myself . The plan was made last week but the event is next week you could almost say I forgot something that hasn't happened yet lol ;)
You obviously didn't forget, you made a post about both events proving yourself wrong.
Also, you didn't forget the event(future), you forgot you made plans(past).
Either way you are WRONG!
Woooosh . Took that joke way to seriously .
" could almost say" implies it's not accurate 95% right is still 100% wrong lol , and the lol at the end with the wink face also screams joke.
But I'm glad to see you have forgotten your sense of humor and irony (Past).
Or you might of never had one (Therefore never forgot anything).- tward930New Spectator
"Treeburner;c-2076778" wrote:
"Monel;c-2076722" wrote:
"Treeburner;c-2076634" wrote:
"Monel;c-2076420" wrote:
"FurytheOriginal;c-2076375" wrote:
Well the devs did state they would include it in the next update but then changed the post to say a "future" update
Apparently they forgot
That's the thing about the future it's always sometime later. One can never forget something that hasn't happened.
I forgot I made plans with someone for next week and double booked myself . The plan was made last week but the event is next week you could almost say I forgot something that hasn't happened yet lol ;)
You obviously didn't forget, you made a post about both events proving yourself wrong.
Also, you didn't forget the event(future), you forgot you made plans(past).
Either way you are WRONG!
Woooosh . Took that joke way to seriously .
" could almost say" implies it's not accurate 95% right is still 100% wrong lol , and the lol at the end with the wink face also screams joke.
But I'm glad to see you have forgotten your sense of humor and irony (Past).
Or you might of never had one (Therefore never forgot anything).
Oh I thought it was funny. But probably not the way you meant it to be funny. Oh well, we both laughed. "Bloodshield;c-2076905" wrote:
Back on topic... although those comments made me smile too.
So what’s the logic of announcing a kit ‘touch up’ and tag change on the two vets... and then not releasing it in the next update.. I guess they needed to get it out there before announcing Vet Han as a requirement for GL Kylo otherwise it wouldn’t make sense.... oh no... that would make no difference as he’s part of the Resistance faction not the FO.
But at least we know they are going to be updated at some point, so not quite as galling to get them to relics as it would have been.... at least not as galling as r5 Rose!
But on the GAC Feat... so you can either use a toon that hasn’t been fully released F2P yet with your JTR lead, or a pair of vets that will be in your faction, but aren’t yet. Makes as much sense as these feat being centred around scoundrels... like Jedi Training Rey.
Why does everyone keep thinking you need to use the vets under JTR for this feat? They work just fine on a scoundrel or smuggler team- LordDirtNew TravelerCan we get Palpatine a FO tag? Maybe all the other FO besides Phasma and Hux a Final Order tag with Palpatine?
"littleMAC77;c-2076913" wrote:
"Bloodshield;c-2076905" wrote:
Back on topic... although those comments made me smile too.
So what’s the logic of announcing a kit ‘touch up’ and tag change on the two vets... and then not releasing it in the next update.. I guess they needed to get it out there before announcing Vet Han as a requirement for GL Kylo otherwise it wouldn’t make sense.... oh no... that would make no difference as he’s part of the Resistance faction not the FO.
But at least we know they are going to be updated at some point, so not quite as galling to get them to relics as it would have been.... at least not as galling as r5 Rose!
But on the GAC Feat... so you can either use a toon that hasn’t been fully released F2P yet with your JTR lead, or a pair of vets that will be in your faction, but aren’t yet. Makes as much sense as these feat being centred around scoundrels... like Jedi Training Rey.
Why does everyone keep thinking you need to use the vets under JTR for this feat? They work just fine on a scoundrel or smuggler team
The issue is they announced the changes would take place in their next update. The update went live (that one that delayed a TW) and now if you check the post it is edited to say a *future* update instead. Very little is changing with them so not sure what the delay is. There's not really a good reason I can think of to wait and change them."Jack1210;c-2077303" wrote:
"littleMAC77;c-2076913" wrote:
"Bloodshield;c-2076905" wrote:
Back on topic... although those comments made me smile too.
So what’s the logic of announcing a kit ‘touch up’ and tag change on the two vets... and then not releasing it in the next update.. I guess they needed to get it out there before announcing Vet Han as a requirement for GL Kylo otherwise it wouldn’t make sense.... oh no... that would make no difference as he’s part of the Resistance faction not the FO.
But at least we know they are going to be updated at some point, so not quite as galling to get them to relics as it would have been.... at least not as galling as r5 Rose!
But on the GAC Feat... so you can either use a toon that hasn’t been fully released F2P yet with your JTR lead, or a pair of vets that will be in your faction, but aren’t yet. Makes as much sense as these feat being centred around scoundrels... like Jedi Training Rey.
Why does everyone keep thinking you need to use the vets under JTR for this feat? They work just fine on a scoundrel or smuggler team
The issue is they announced the changes would take place in their next update. The update went live (that one that delayed a TW) and now if you check the post it is edited to say a *future* update instead. Very little is changing with them so not sure what the delay is. There's not really a good reason I can think of to wait and change them.
Those are all valid points that I agree with, but then why mention the feat that in no way requires resistance synergy?"littleMAC77;c-2077315" wrote:
"Jack1210;c-2077303" wrote:
"littleMAC77;c-2076913" wrote:
"Bloodshield;c-2076905" wrote:
Back on topic... although those comments made me smile too.
So what’s the logic of announcing a kit ‘touch up’ and tag change on the two vets... and then not releasing it in the next update.. I guess they needed to get it out there before announcing Vet Han as a requirement for GL Kylo otherwise it wouldn’t make sense.... oh no... that would make no difference as he’s part of the Resistance faction not the FO.
But at least we know they are going to be updated at some point, so not quite as galling to get them to relics as it would have been.... at least not as galling as r5 Rose!
But on the GAC Feat... so you can either use a toon that hasn’t been fully released F2P yet with your JTR lead, or a pair of vets that will be in your faction, but aren’t yet. Makes as much sense as these feat being centred around scoundrels... like Jedi Training Rey.
Why does everyone keep thinking you need to use the vets under JTR for this feat? They work just fine on a scoundrel or smuggler team
The issue is they announced the changes would take place in their next update. The update went live (that one that delayed a TW) and now if you check the post it is edited to say a *future* update instead. Very little is changing with them so not sure what the delay is. There's not really a good reason I can think of to wait and change them.
Those are all valid points that I agree with, but then why mention the feat that in no way requires resistance synergy?
I mean I do see the point they aren't required to be together, but why is she even acknowledged in a feat during the GAC for scoundrels/smugglers unless there is something tying her into that? Kinda like if two people in her faction doubled as scoundrels. And if they didn't originally plan to have this in place by this(this rounds start), why not have separate feats for each duo? They seem to have wanted the synergy to exist by this point, but re-prioritized and din't make this change when they had planned."ZAP;c-2077320" wrote:
"littleMAC77;c-2077315" wrote:
The feat doesn’t require the synergy, but I bet they created the feat with the new synergy in mind and expected to have the tags updated with the update. Only reason I can think of that they’d even have that feat."Jack1210;c-2077303" wrote:
"littleMAC77;c-2076913" wrote:
"Bloodshield;c-2076905" wrote:
Back on topic... although those comments made me smile too.
So what’s the logic of announcing a kit ‘touch up’ and tag change on the two vets... and then not releasing it in the next update.. I guess they needed to get it out there before announcing Vet Han as a requirement for GL Kylo otherwise it wouldn’t make sense.... oh no... that would make no difference as he’s part of the Resistance faction not the FO.
But at least we know they are going to be updated at some point, so not quite as galling to get them to relics as it would have been.... at least not as galling as r5 Rose!
But on the GAC Feat... so you can either use a toon that hasn’t been fully released F2P yet with your JTR lead, or a pair of vets that will be in your faction, but aren’t yet. Makes as much sense as these feat being centred around scoundrels... like Jedi Training Rey.
Why does everyone keep thinking you need to use the vets under JTR for this feat? They work just fine on a scoundrel or smuggler team
The issue is they announced the changes would take place in their next update. The update went live (that one that delayed a TW) and now if you check the post it is edited to say a *future* update instead. Very little is changing with them so not sure what the delay is. There's not really a good reason I can think of to wait and change them.
Those are all valid points that I agree with, but then why mention the feat that in no way requires resistance synergy?
Really? No clue why they would have 2 smugglers be a part of a feat in the Smuggler themed GAC? imo its that JTR and Poe are even included that is way more odd"littleMAC77;c-2077326" wrote:
"ZAP;c-2077320" wrote:
"littleMAC77;c-2077315" wrote:
The feat doesn’t require the synergy, but I bet they created the feat with the new synergy in mind and expected to have the tags updated with the update. Only reason I can think of that they’d even have that feat."Jack1210;c-2077303" wrote:
"littleMAC77;c-2076913" wrote:
"Bloodshield;c-2076905" wrote:
Back on topic... although those comments made me smile too.
So what’s the logic of announcing a kit ‘touch up’ and tag change on the two vets... and then not releasing it in the next update.. I guess they needed to get it out there before announcing Vet Han as a requirement for GL Kylo otherwise it wouldn’t make sense.... oh no... that would make no difference as he’s part of the Resistance faction not the FO.
But at least we know they are going to be updated at some point, so not quite as galling to get them to relics as it would have been.... at least not as galling as r5 Rose!
But on the GAC Feat... so you can either use a toon that hasn’t been fully released F2P yet with your JTR lead, or a pair of vets that will be in your faction, but aren’t yet. Makes as much sense as these feat being centred around scoundrels... like Jedi Training Rey.
Why does everyone keep thinking you need to use the vets under JTR for this feat? They work just fine on a scoundrel or smuggler team
The issue is they announced the changes would take place in their next update. The update went live (that one that delayed a TW) and now if you check the post it is edited to say a *future* update instead. Very little is changing with them so not sure what the delay is. There's not really a good reason I can think of to wait and change them.
Those are all valid points that I agree with, but then why mention the feat that in no way requires resistance synergy?
Really? No clue why they would have 2 smugglers be a part of a feat in the Smuggler themed GAC? imo its that JTR and Poe are even included that is way more odd
I didn’t say having the smugglers didn’t make sense in a smuggler themed GAC. I agree it’s the JTR and Poe that makes it odd and was assuming having all 4 together in that feat, even though you only need 2, was so people could try the new resistance tags on the vets. Maybe not and that feat is just random to include Rey and Poe?- Mine both have the resistance tag.
About SWGOH General Discussion
Discuss and share your feedback on Star Wars: Galaxy of Heroes with fellow players.
78,022 PostsLatest Activity: 9 minutes agoRelated Posts
Recent Discussions
- 10 minutes ago
- 2 hours ago
- 4 hours ago
- 5 hours ago