Leviathan + Dagger vs Leviathan + Dagger
Why do I go second in 4/5 battles every day? As I understand it, you have the RNG set up incorrectly in this fleet. And you don't want to do anything about it, because it's broken. Why fix what's bro...
Forum Discussion
Sorry guys but this isn’t true. The fact is that the people who are posting about bad leviathan RNG are the ones who just got super unlucky in fleet arena today. Use the tie reaper as first reinforcement, it gives you a second coin flip for ult so your chance of losing is halved. Yes, the meta should change so it isn’t reliant on winning speed ties. But the rng is not broken. People have been saying this about simming nodes for years, and have been proven wrong every time.
If RNG wasn't broken, I would have been the first in at least 3 out of 6 battles. But when you're the second in 9 out of 10 battles all the time, no TIE Reaper will help. And I can't be happy for someone who's the first all the time - it won't give me any crystals. But the developers don't read this forum. Otherwise, Leviathan would have been fixed a long time ago.
We don't fix what's broken, we finish it off. - That's the developers' attitude towards their own game.
No, you are not guaranteed to ever go first. This is why people love coming to post about this. The mentality that on any given day you are owed by CG to go first in at least half of your fleet battles. In fact, it is the opposite. If you play fleet every day you are almost guaranteed to run into days where you never go first. And also days where you go first every time. This is proof that the RNG is not rigged.
And are you seriously arguing that my experience using the exact same ship as you is invalid? Lmao CG has not altered the RNG specifically for you to lose. They don’t care about you.
RNG isn't broken, the fact that it is not a clear 50/50 result shows that it is indeed working correctly. If it was broken you'd have been first in 3 out of 6 battles.
You are making the common mistake of assuming that out of two likely outcomes that either outcome is equally likely.
Maybe learn first before complaining....ok, I'll bite, what are you talking about? If it's supposed to be 50/50 how is it working correctly if it runs so far out of expectation? How should this work, if out of two likely outcomes one outcome is more likely?
