Forum Widgets
Recent Discussions
Singleplayer for Hazard Zone (Deathmatch, too)
I've been in queue for Hazard Zone for over an hour and I still haven't found 1 singular match yet. I am certain that this mode needs to have singleplayer support, because it's truly a dead gamemode... Alternatively, let the match start counter go all the way down from 8, to 4/2/1. The achievements for Hazard Zone now are effectively impossible otherwise, so if possible, for the skeleton crew still on this game (somehow), please add in single-player starting for Hazard Zone. oh yeah, while Deathmatch still has much better matchmaking odds, that too will eventually deplete through time, making progression harder for those still stuck in 2042. Singleplayer for that too, would be nice.
Iwo Jima Breakthrough 24/7 was really amazing
Hello, I wonder if there's a chance Iwo Jima Breakthrough 24/7 will return. It was so much fun to play that the other maps are now uninteresting. I played Iwo Jima Breakthrough almost every day, and it was one of the best experiences I’ve had in BF2042. Funny timing: my birthday was October 6, and right after that the Iwo Jima rotation and related events ended. Anyway thanks to the devs for that memorable content. I hope the map or a 24/7 rotation like that could come back more often.
BF2042 in game XP reduced by upto 50% post BF6 launch. Disgusting.
I have noticed just now that, post BF6 launch, the in game XP of BF2042 for kills, ribbons, objectives, etc has been reduced by upto 50%, to force slow progression, and to make players buy BF6. Shameful. Old / Regular values (without bonus XP weekends, etc): Kills : 50 XP Combat ribbon : 500 XP Sector Defended : 10 XP Holding objective : 10 / 15 XP Securing objective : at teast 10 XP. New values(Post BF6 launch): Kills : 25 XP Combat ribbon : 400 XP Sector Defended : 5 XP Holding objective : 8 XP Securing objective : 8 XP. Some times you are not receiving XP for kills and objectives at all. I have been a BF player since BF3. I remember, EA used to release DLCs for BF3 with stronger/overpowered guns, so that the people with no DLCs used to have weaker options at their disposal, to force them to buy DLCs and now this in case of BF2042, where, the in game XP is reduced by upto 50%. What makes EA think, that they can tamper with the already bought product of people, and make the existing product almost worthless, to make player buy BF6? If this is how EA values its customers, then I am DONE with EA. I was waiting for BF6 reviews before buying it, but now I wont. I will no longer buy any EA product now, because of such insult. I am done. I am attaching screenshots as proof.
TY for the experience
Look you guys got a lot of flak but wow you did fix and improve the game and whilst not a true heir to the series, it did have enough DNA to be a part in it. The BF pass was done but I also left with learning the drive and the flight . . . Maybe I'll visit but not anytime soon, gonna get busy.
Additional Rewards for the Road to Battlefield 6
( I'm using DeepL to translate because I can't speak English. ) This is my personal hope. Skins for Road to Battlefield 6 are now available for purchase. Therefore, I think it would be nice if there were some kind of additional reward for completing all missions except the weekly bonus missions.
NVIDIA fix for BF2042 and BF6 has been released: v581.42 - WHQL
NVIDIA fix for BF2042 and BF6 has been released: v581.42 - WHQL The NVIDIA GPU fix is finally released which prevents crashes on startup of BF2042 as well as BF6. And of course some enhancements. So we can finally update our NVIDIA Drivers from v577.00 to v581.42 !! Downloads and more to read here: Desktop: GeForce Game Ready-Driver, Driver Version: 581.42 - WHQL https://www.nvidia.com/en-eu/geforce/drivers/results/257133/ Notebook: GeForce Game Ready-Driver, Driver Version: 581.42 - WHQL https://www.nvidia.com/en-eu/geforce/drivers/results/257134/ Game Ready for Battlefield 6 This new Game Ready Driver provides the best gaming experience for the latest new games supporting DLSS 4 technology including Battlefield 6 . . . Fixed Gaming Bugs Battlefield 2042: Increased GPU Crashing when calling CDXGISwapChain::Present() [5446395] . . .
Lets make Battlefield 2042 better for everyone with FSR support
There are many people who cant enjoy of this game even me because of older hardware but fsr is supported on every amd gpu so if they add FSR support on this game we all be will be able to enjoy this game better i love this game because of breathrough mode its so fun so please creators of Battlefield 2042 please add FSR support into this game Guys i need your support lets upvote it so they can help us
Digital artbook and soundtrack missing again
Hello, I previously had access to the digital artbook, and soundtrack included with my Battlefield 2042 Ultimate Edition purchase, but I can no longer access these bonuses. The official EA page that was used to claim this content now returns a 404 error: https://www.ea.com/games/battlefield/battlefield-2042/media/ultimate-edition-benefits This is concerning as these digital extras were part of the Ultimate Edition package I purchased. The inability to access content that was previously available is very frustrating. I request that EA either restore the functionality of the original link or provide an alternative method to access the digital artbook and soundtrack. These are separate digital materials, not in-game items. Thank you for addressing this issue.
False Ban after Playing Portal Mode - Loyal Player
Hello EA Community Team and fellow players, I am creating this post following a suggestion from EA Help support, as I am desperately seeking help regarding a false ban on my account. My Account Details: EA ID: MAX_Angelina EA Help Case Number: #221608365 The Situation: My account was banned on August 30, 2024, shortly after I played the Portal mode in Battlefield 2042. I have submitted two formal appeals through the official channel, but both were denied with a generic message stating I "engaged in cheating." Why I Believe This is a False Ban: I am confident that the ban was triggered by a misunderstanding. On the day of the ban, I was playing in a custom Portal mode server, primarily fighting against AI bots. During this session, I achieved a high number of kills (around 100-200). I believe the anti-cheat system may have flagged this legitimate gameplay against AI as suspicious activity. I want to emphasize that I have never used any cheat, hack, or unauthorized software. I have been a loyal fan of the Battlefield series for years and value fair play above all else. The idea of cheating is against everything I stand for as a player. What I've Done So Far: Appealed twice via the official dispute system. Spoke with a very helpful EA Help advisor named Manishka on September 12. She confirmed my details and escalated the case. The case status is now listed as "Waiting for Studio." I have been waiting patiently for over a week for an update from the studio team. I am now turning to the forum because I genuinely do not know what else to do. Having my account banned for simply enjoying the game as intended feels incredibly unfair. My Request: Could a Community Manager or someone from the DICE/EA team please take a look at my case (#221608365)? I am asking for a manual review of my game data, specifically focusing on my Portal mode session against AI on August 30. If I truly violated the rules, I would appreciate knowing the exact evidence. Thank you for your time and consideration. I truly hope to have this resolved and return to the battlefield fairly. Sincerely, YangLobby timeout
Why??? What is the point of this?? I can't count how many times I've waited in a lobby for the required number of players only to get bounced just as the match is starting!!!! Then to make it worse, I can't get back into that match and have to go through the whole **bleep** process all over again. Why have a timeout? Just let us wait. And if there finally becomes enough players, disable the timeout so we dont get bounced from the match and spend all GD day waiting in lobbies!! It's infuriating!Suggestion: Spectator Mode and Kill Replay to combat cheats
Spectator Mode and Kill Replay would make it easier to detect cheats. Players could easily record and provide evidence when reporting suspected users. We would be able to replay the video, play it on slower speed to check for unusual snapping/movement that imitate soft aimlocks. I have notice that blatant cheaters (100%) HS has gone down a lot, but there are a lot of high level players who are very suspicious, like getting as high as 140-10 K/D etc, and most games are like 70-5 K/D. I know its possible, but every close encounter against them you die in 1 sec. which make me think they might be using some sort of soft hacks. Having those replay would help in providing evidence against them.Is the visual recoil of the weapon AK5C normal now?
When I was playing recently, I suddenly thought of this weapon and found that the shaking of the scope was so severe that it made me feel physically uncomfortable. I also noticed that when I choose the official bot mode to play, the visual recoil of this weapon is much smaller. So is this the effect that DICE wants? At present, I think it is very inappropriate. I wonder if the filling data of this weapon is abnormal. I hope to get an official reply. Thank you very much.MAG Domination on Battlefield 2042 via Portal is Live
So I spent the last 2 weeks building MAG's full Domination game mode, with a lot of polish, to the best I could given the constraints in Portal, for Battlefield 2042. Features: 64 v 64 2 Platoons each side 4 squads of 8 players in each platoon Squad Leaders, Platoon Leaders, and OIC/Commander Squad Leader, Platoon Leader, and Commander abilities proximity intel morale boost area intel vehicle boost rapid deploy blockade Unique bunker spawns for each defending squad Base spawns for each defending squad Outskirts spawns for each attacking squad Forward spawns for each attacking squad (including parachute drops) EMP (formerly known as AA), Sensor Array, and Vehicle Support Depot for each defending platoon Sequentially unlocked 1st pair ("burn off towers"), 2nd pair ("cool off towers"), and final base damage objectives for each platoon Full live-updated UI for objectives, cooldowns, leadership selection and demotions, spawn selection, squad cycling, and current objective progress A (hopefully) robust squad assignment queue/algorithm to try to ensure premade native BF squads end up in the same 8-person "MAG" squad Orbital is the first and only supported map Code (rule engine) is significantly functionally coded and modular that I can add new maps rather quickly Missing Features: Skill tree (obviously) Proper Squad/Platoon/Company Voice chat (need to rely on discord) Bunkers and EMP are control areas (stand on for 20 seconds) by anyone, not equipment that is repairable by specific repair tools (but you can regain control as defenders without alerting attackers, as intended by sneak repairmen) Sensor Array and Vehicle Support Depot are arm/disarm objectives, not equipment that is repairable by specific repair tools No "jamming" (yet, maybe...) No air assault or mortars as leader abilities No OIC cooldown refresh (yet, easy to add) No helicopters with gunners for attacker forward spawns No bunker turrets No funnelling of map to prevent attackers from sneaking around (however, the map and objectives are chosen and placed in a way to discourage straying from the platoon-on-platoon lane No spawn protection for some attacking spawn points (yet, I can fix this if it is a problem) Warning, I have tested this a lot on my own, but never with multiple players. While I am sure the logic will work, I am not sure if the server can support the load of 128 players with this custom logic. I am looking for people to play and test. I realize BF2042 is less than 1 month from being eclipsed by BF6, but better late than never. Plus, I plan on making this for BF6 too, but sadly it might be limited to 32v32. Server is called "MAG Domination 64v64 (v0.1.0) | Custom", although the version will change over time as I update. Experience Code: AB7J3K I have created a Discord server which I can link in the comments or via DM. If you are unfamiliar with MAG and/or its Domination game mode, I would be happy to explain more in the comments or on the Discord server.
A retrospective on the state and value of vehicles in 2042
On a regular conquest server, the infantry per team number to 32 Each of these infantry if they are an engineer they can carry a shoulder mounted launcher and Sticky explosives or AT mines. Outside of the regular gadgets one of the specialists can shoot TV missiles while another can do a "hack" that can practically immobilize an armored vehicle or **bleep** an aircraft that comes too close. An honorable mention should also go to the anti materiel rifles and the Railgun rifle (someone in my platoon loves to snipe pilots out of stealth helis with it). Just these alone could do scary things in the ideal scenario where enough players actually focused fire with them on one vehicle at a time Depending on how seriously they take the anti vehicle role a vehicle will either thrive due to being ignored or will not be able to do anything other than trying to escape. ------------------ Now let us look at the vehicle spawn system. There are limited slots so you will not have for example 20 tanks per team. They also have a long respawn after they are gone. For some reason DICE decided to add an extra respawn penalty to try to prevent people from taking the same vehicle type after they lost the previous one. This has never been addressed by any official source and it is really annoying. Imagine having a period where you could not use Recon because someone just killed you when you were just playing Recon. I believe that more often than not there are too few available (worthwhile) vehicles for the amount of infantry that they may have to contend with. I do not think I got to have my fill of a good vehicle in 2042 due to how often they are taken, destroyed or how some random thread is cutting my run short and good luck getting the same vehicle again. The ground vehicles which have any sort of considerable protection from the outside are slow, have relatively narrow vertical turret angles and even after several improvements, their turrets still turn slowly, unlike those in BF3/4 Their acceleration leaves a lot to be desired. Especially when considering how many rockets they have to dodge and how easily they can get stuck on small bits of terrain. The ground vehicles often depend a lot on infantry to be their meatshields which is more or less the reverse of what a tank is for. The aircraft in general have having a better time the smaller they are because they are much harder to see from a large distance and are much more agile. Meanwhile the larger ones are often clumsy easy targets. The planes are fast enough that it is quite hard to make out and do anything on infantry and even when they do, their high caliber weapons are mostly just scratching the small meatbags on the ground. Any vehicles or vehicle weapons that were reasonably effective at hitting infantry with splash have gotten one or more nerfs. (the attack jets nerf on its HE rounds is the latest example) The helicopters are in a better state where they can still be strong vs a mostly lazy enemy team which is trying to ignore them so they can focus on the few diligent people who will try to them off with liz missiles etc with various levels of success. ---------------------- In general I am a player who has enjoyed and used vehicles a lot in previous titles. But in 2042 I have often felt that it was just not worth it to try to fight other for the vehicle slots only to have a minimal effect in the outcome of the round and having to wait a long time for a chance to get the next spawn of the vehicles I want. In Conclusion Vehicles in 2042 are mostly lousy and weak. I hope that DICE has learned some lessons about that and makes them significant (but not OP ofc) in BF6. But if engineers can carry both AT and AA launchers at the same time in BF6, I think that wont happen
1942 Weapon Scopes misalignment
I love using the M1 Garand in 2042, but the (2-4x?) scope appears to be misaligned to where the vertical reticle line extends up and past the center of the scope circle. I've noticed this for the other 1942 portal guns that use the same scope. It makes enemies hard to track and shots hard to follow-up because the lines of the scope are so thick and the bullets don't travel to the center of the scope, they instead travel to the misaligned tip of the vertical reticle line. I also noticed the skewed angle of the lower-magnification sights on 1942 portal weapons (1-1.5x) where the angle of the sight seems skewed and the circular reticle is also misaligned vertically in the sight. Was this intentional or am I just bad?
Featured Places
Battlefield
Check out the EA Forums community for the Battlefield franchise.Battlefield 6
Discuss the latest news and game information around Battlefield 6 in the community forums.Battlefield Game Info Hub
Read the latest news and announcements from the Battlefield Team.Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Discuss the latest news and game information around Battlefield 2042 in the community forums.Battlefield 2042 Technical Issues & Bugs
Having issues with Battlefield 2042? Join here to report bugs, and find help with, crashes, connectivity and more.Battlefield V
Join the Battlefield V community to learn all you need to know. Find game information and updates, talk tactics and share Battlefield moments.Battlefield Franchise Discussion
Discuss Battlefield games in this community forum.
