3 v 3 is cringe and we all hate it.

I think it's slight easier to be successful in 3v3 compared to 5v5 if you're a try-hard.  So, from this perspective it has its supporters. 

For me I tend to go 7-2 or 6-3 in 3v3 then instantly go  0-3 in the first round of 5v5 and end up about 4-5 or 3-6 in 5v5.  I don't like the start of the season mismatches from playing 5v5 and 3v3.  Even though I'm much more successful in 3v3, I'd like to see it go.....or at the very least was on a different Skill Point ladder.

I don’t like 3v3. I wish it happened a couple times a year. It’s frustrating, the game wasn’t designed for three it’s designed for 5. That said I don’t need to 💩 on everyone to get my point across. 

3v3 is fine. This is coming from someone who's well on their way to completing Leviathan requirements.

mike-tizzle wrote:

Only padawans with trash accounts and losers with no job find this enjoyable.

I am reading this as you find it too difficult to compete, so you must make childish insults to those that do enjoy it

Come now, I'm sure some of the people are winners with no job.

The main downside of 3v3 particularly in Kyber is the number of battles. Why would you suggest more zones in 5v5? 

Easy solution: don't play 3v3. There isn't a CG exec with a gun to your head telling you to sign up for 3v3 seasons. 

Dont presume to state your opinion speaks for all.  Im no big fan of pvp but im a lesser fan of people saying that they know how the player base feels.  Just dont play it.

All I heard was "Waaaaaaaahhhhh" from someone that obviously isn't very good.

Dont play it then. Me, personaly, I dont mind 3x3. I like 5x5 better. Still 3x3 is better than conquest, tw or that new era stuff. I think GAC just need a bit more love. Not been touched at all for years. But its still the gamemode why I play this game on regular basis