Bf6 most cheated game in the last decade.
Based on recent statistics battlefield has actually taken the lead for most cheated fps in the last decade. Based off of steam charts and active bans and the fact that EA and Dice do not IP ban the ...
Forum Discussion
What accusation?
Do you understand what an accusation is?
I made a statement, not an accusation. Maybe you should question how smart you are before questioning others.
If you want to put your money where you mouth is add me and we'll post every scoreboard game.
Lets play I welcome to join me anytime. Your refusal would just mean you can't accept truth.
", I'm not surprised every post you've had is just about massive amounts of cheaters"
Statement? What statement? Can’t you reread your own text? The quoted part of your message implies that you’re accusing me of calling others cheaters simply because they’re better than me, which isn’t true.
"Lets play I welcome to join me anytime."
After that? I honestly hope no one takes you up on it. Your confidence and your focus on being at the top of the scoreboard, says enough on its own. The biggest irony is trying to prove your point through a 1v1. That really doesn’t demonstrate much.
By the way, I do find your attempts to defend yourself somewhat amusing , it’s been a while since I’ve come across someone this easy to argue against.
"Your refusal would just mean you can't accept truth."
It doesn’t work like that, and you know it. :) So feel free to keep your 1v1 challenge for someone else, my point still stands regardless. If you can’t handle that, you’re free to leave.
"I'm not suprised every post you've had is just about massive amounts of cheaters."
Yes I can read. Its clear to me that you can't and seem to make up lies one after another. Oh btw here are you posts.
You said I am whining, but based on your posts, it's just you whining. And yes I can read my text, but can you not recall yours?
Looks like a lot of whining to me.
You said "Sure I'll believe you when red snow falls." So I said let me prove it to you. You questioned, I offered proof.
Who said I need to challenge you 1v1? I don't see anywhere in my comments that said lets 1v1. Why would I 1v1 you? What does that prove?I offered you to play together to show you that normal players can reach top of leaderboards in games consistently. You have been saying its filled with cheaters, implying that normal players can't win. Wouldn't demonstrating a normal player reaching top leaderboard every game disprove your rants about these cheaters?
All I see is a bunch of lies from you, putting word's in other peoples mouths, and inability to accept anything that would prove you wrong.
It seems more apparent that you can't handle someone disagreeing with you and offering a chance to prove you wrong. I'd own up to my words and say you were right if we played and every game was filled with cheaters. I'm pretty sure it's you who can't handle it.What quoted part? I don't see any quoted parts in my statement.
Who said I asked you to 1v1 me? What would that prove as you mentioned?
Did I say let's 1v1? Maybe you should reread the post.
You like to project and put words in other people's mouths.
You said accusations in the previous response, where in my statement was there an accusation?
You still haven't answered.
You question others intelligence so I question yours. You get what you serve out.
You call BS about my experience in the game with "Sure, I'll believe you when red snow falls."
I offer you to play to with me to prove you are wrong.
Your post history shows you always complaining about cheaters and how rampant they are.
I offer you the experience to see that normal players can hit leaderboards. If there
were as many cheaters as you complain about, then it wouldn't be possible to do that.
You state your point still stands regardless. Well, here we are different.
I'm okay to be proven wrong and will accept a different stance. I'll state you were right and I'm wrong.
But it's pretty clear that you wouldn't be able to handle being proven wrong.Have you actually read what I wrote? This is what I wrote:
"But yeah, maxiq is just a human aimbot who never misses, not even after 10 hours of gameplay. Sure, I’ll believe you when red snow falls."
And then you come back with this:"You call BS about my experience in the game with ‘Sure, I'll believe you when red snow falls.’"
Doesn’t it bother you that I wasn’t even talking about you, but about Maxiq? Does that really not bother you?After this, do you honestly think there’s any point in debating anything with you?And by the way, the accusation actually starts here. Let me quote what you wrote:"If you think this is cheating, I'm not surprised every post you've had is just about massive amounts of cheaters."
You’re trying to frame me as someone who thinks everyone better than me is cheating. You might not have outright accused me, but you definitely implied it. Don’t sugarcoat it. I have absolutely no problem with you being at the top of the scoreboard. But that still doesn’t rule out the possibility that there’s a cheater in the match.
"I offer you the experience to see that normal players can hit leaderboards."I’ve been at the top of the scoreboard more than once myself. I don’t really understand what you’re trying to imply with that I don’t play the game just to be number one. I don’t know how old you are, buddy, but considering how many times you’ve brought this up, I think something’s off upstairs. Being among the top isn’t that **bleep** hard, you just have to play the objective aggressively to earn points. It’s much harder to earn as many points through simple kills as other players do by capturing objectives. But the fact that I encounter a cheater and the game basically turns into a Battlefield 6 menu simulator, that’s not very fun.
Let me make this very clear since it seems you are mixing posts from separate discussions, intentionally deliberate or not. This is what has been said on this specific post:
1. I say:
"Well these cheaters must suck because I'm consistently on top of the leaderboard and they aren't in every match."
2. You reply:
"Do you feel smart throwing around accusations? So much for EA’s anti-cheat system. The whole gameplay can be screwed up for 4 dollars. But yeah, maxiq is just a human aimbot who never misses, not even after 10 hours of gameplay. Sure, I’ll believe you when red snow falls"
3. I reply:
"What accusation?
Do you understand what an accusation is?
I made a statement, not an accusation. Maybe you should question how smart you are before questioning others.
If you want to put your money where you mouth is add me and we'll post every scoreboard game.
Lets play I welcome to join me anytime. Your refusal would just mean you can't accept truth."
1. Clearly you don't like my STATEMENT regardless if it's true or not.
2. You reply saying I've made an accusation. You decide to attack intelligence and call me a liar.
3. I reply in the same mannerism.
I'm not adding more posts here since you continue to flip discussions from different posts.
As for this post which you constantly are mixing up between other posts.
You state "do you honestly think there's any point in debating anything with you." You don't have to. Then quit. All you do is complain about the game. Your entire history of posts is about complaining about cheating.
As for your "talking...about Maxiq". If this is what you meant, then this is misinterpretation from my part. So then, are you also stating "Do you feel smart throwing around accusations". Am I to presume you are talking about Maxiq here too then or are you attacking intelligence here then?
I am okay if I misinterpreted. Have you considered maybe you misinterpreted what I said then?
Did I say that there is no possibilities of cheaters in this game? Why do you keep brining up a point that has never been said? It's an FPS online shooter, there's going to be cheaters no matter what. As for what you and I may believe in terms of proportionality of cheaters, we may disagree. You then state "I don't know how old you are and something off upstairs." So you like to bring up points that I've never said, resort to insults in your debate rather than what's actually been said. Seems like you are detracting from the main arguments and being dishonest here.
I agree that obviously cheaters make the game not very fun. I can agree with you on that. My point is that I don't think there are as many cheaters as most people proclaim there are to be.
Featured Places
