Bf6 most cheated game in the last decade.

Have you actually read what I wrote? This is what I wrote:

"But yeah, maxiq is just a human aimbot who never misses, not even after 10 hours of gameplay. Sure, I’ll believe you when red snow falls."

And then you come back with this:

"You call BS about my experience in the game with ‘Sure, I'll believe you when red snow falls.’"

Doesn’t it bother you that I wasn’t even talking about you, but about Maxiq? Does that really not bother you?After this, do you honestly think there’s any point in debating anything with you?And by the way, the accusation actually starts here. Let me quote what you wrote:

"If you think this is cheating, I'm not surprised every post you've had is just about massive amounts of cheaters."

You’re trying to frame me as someone who thinks everyone better than me is cheating. You might not have outright accused me, but you definitely implied it. Don’t sugarcoat it. I have absolutely no problem with you being at the top of the scoreboard. But that still doesn’t rule out the possibility that there’s a cheater in the match.

"I offer you the experience to see that normal players can hit leaderboards." 

I’ve been at the top of the scoreboard more than once myself. I don’t really understand what you’re trying to imply with that I don’t play the game just to be number one. I don’t know how old you are, buddy, but considering how many times you’ve brought this up, I think something’s off upstairs. Being among the top isn’t that **bleep** hard, you just have to play the objective aggressively to earn points.  It’s much harder to earn as many points through simple kills as other players do by capturing objectives. But the fact that I encounter a cheater and the game basically turns into a Battlefield 6 menu simulator, that’s not very fun.

Let me make this very clear since it seems you are mixing posts from separate discussions, intentionally deliberate or not. This is what has been said on this specific post:

1. I say:
"Well these cheaters must suck because I'm consistently on top of the leaderboard and they aren't in every match."

2. You reply:
"Do you feel smart throwing around accusations? So much for EA’s anti-cheat system. The whole gameplay can be screwed up for 4 dollars. But yeah, maxiq is just a human aimbot who never misses, not even after 10 hours of gameplay. Sure, I’ll believe you when red snow falls"

3. I reply:
"What accusation?
Do you understand what an accusation is?
I made a statement, not an accusation. Maybe you should question how smart you are before questioning others.
If you want to put your money where you mouth is add me and we'll post every scoreboard game.
Lets play I welcome to join me anytime. Your refusal would just mean you can't accept truth."

1. Clearly you don't like my STATEMENT regardless if it's true or not.
2. You reply saying I've made an accusation. You decide to attack intelligence and call me a liar.
3. I reply in the same mannerism.

I'm not adding more posts here since you continue to flip discussions from different posts.

As for this post which you constantly are mixing up between other posts.
You state "do you honestly think there's any point in debating anything with you." You don't have to. Then quit. All you do is complain about the game. Your entire history of posts is about complaining about cheating. 

As for your "talking...about Maxiq". If this is what you meant, then this is misinterpretation from my part. So then, are you also stating "Do you feel smart throwing around accusations". Am I to presume you are talking about Maxiq here too then or are you attacking intelligence here then?
I am okay if I misinterpreted. Have you considered maybe you misinterpreted what I said then?

Did I say that there is no possibilities of cheaters in this game? Why do you keep brining up a point that has never been said? It's an FPS online shooter, there's going to be cheaters no matter what. As for what you and I may believe in terms of proportionality of cheaters, we may disagree. You then state "I don't know how old you are and something off upstairs." So you like to bring up points that I've never said, resort to insults in your debate rather than what's actually been said. Seems like you are detracting from the main arguments and being dishonest here.

I agree that obviously cheaters make the game not very fun. I can agree with you on that. My point is that I don't think there are as many cheaters as most people proclaim there are to be.

Let’s pause for a moment. I'm not the one who started mixing. 

You were the one replying to me across two different topics, not the other way around. The quotes you pasted are out of chronological order. Let’s put things in proper sequence so the situation is clear.

I wrote:
“The reporting system is completely useless against cheaters. This game is as dead as BF5. It’s crawling with cheaters. And the best part is that now cheaters can proudly stream themselves cheating, and people even applaud them for it.”

You replied:
“Well these cheaters must suck because I'm consistently on top of the leaderboard and they aren't in every match.”

I responded:
“Of course they aren’t in every match. But they are in some matches.”

-I made another reply where I accused a specific YouTuber of cheating. The comment was first moderated and later likely removed by admins.

You then responded to me in other topic:
“For someone that dedicates a good portion of their life playing FPS, I'm pretty disappointed in his gameplay. Was not impressed. If you think this is cheating, I'm not surprised every post you've had is just about massive amounts of cheaters.”

When you looked up that YouTuber, you may have missed the clips where he flicks with extreme precision repeatedly, on controller, with barely any visible hand movement. On his Twitch streams, he appears capable of maintaining this level of performance for hours at a time. I’m not arguing here about whether it is cheating or not — I’m simply pointing out that based on your reply, it doesn’t seem like you’ve seen the more questionable moments.

I then wrote:
“Do you feel smart throwing around accusations? So much for EA’s anti-cheat system. The whole gameplay can be compromised for a few dollars. But sure, he’s just a human aimbot who never misses, even after 10 hours of gameplay. I’ll believe that when red snow falls.”

-After that, I wrote emotionally in response to you. What you misunderstood is that I wasn’t questioning your performance. I was reacting to your sarcastic remark implying that I think everyone better than me must be a cheater.

I think some of the context may have been overlooked, which led to misunderstandings. Your fifth point suggests you responded quickly without fully reviewing the material, and then seemed surprised that I pushed back. You also misread my responses and jumped to the conclusion that this was about proving who ranks higher on the leaderboard. Let me clarify again: it does not matter whether you are top 1 in a match or not:

Based on my experience (and only my experience) there are two common types of cheaters (I'm sure there are more, but these are the ones I'm most familiar with)

1. Console players using hardware assistance for improved aiming. These players often still play objectives and function as team players, because without extreme tools like aimbot or wallhack, they still need positioning and teamwork to survive.

2.  PC players using aimbot or wallhack. These players are typically not team-oriented. They do not need mechanical skill, because the software handles aiming and shooting for them. Their primary focus is getting kills rather than playing objectives.
Motivation-wise, I believe I’m right, even if logically it doesn’t exclude other possibilities. Still, this is how I see it,  this is the pattern I’ve observed from them.

In objective-based modes like Conquest or Escalation   (the modes I play only)  the game rewards tactical play and objective control, not just kill count. Score is determined more by time spent capturing and holding objectives than by KDA alone. That is why in many matches, players with the best KDA are often placed 5th or 6th, while the top positions go to those who played the objective most effectively. In my experience across Battlefield and Call of Duty titles over the past 20 years, players using obvious aimbot or wallhack cheats rarely focus on objectives. They cheat to accumulate kills and feel dominant, even if the game mode itself rewards territory control instead.

This is why I think your argument   “I’m always top 1”  does not necessarily address the issue. Being top 1 in objective modes actually supports the idea that you play properly as a team player.  However, cheaters are usually not concerned with what the mode rewards; they are focused on kills and personal stats. That is the distinction I was trying to make.

I'm going to just say. We can be civil at this point. We can argue all day about who said what and it will go no where anyways. I treat different discussions separately. I can agree and disagree with other players on various topics. You and I probably have some agreements with the cheaters and disagree maybe with their frequency in the game. How I perceive the lack thereof cheaters may not be evident enough for you. That's fine. Maybe it's not evident enough. I may see one point and you may see another. We agree to disagree.