Forum Widgets
Better exchanges
Ea, the game has gotten worse. I ask for something in exchanges. Give us options in which we can exchange our utoty 117 + 108+ ovr player from any event for another a 117, not for 115+. There should be a pick of the 5-6 players available. Let us exchange our toty player for another in the same way. Add another like a116 + 5×115 for 117 as I have 2 stoichkov and another in use. Pls also do this for utoty. These will improve game and I'm sure community can agree.I will delete this game. Shame on you EA
I opened about 320 drafts, I have about 14 players with 115 ovr and today you give me 115 ovr Raphina who I have no chance of exchanging for the UTOTY version because if I haven't gotten enough 115 players so far I have no chance of getting them. I needed Dembele or Mbappe and the players I need you will never give me under any circumstances. If you use the draft system in the next game I will delete this game. Shame on you EA(UTOTY) 117 ovr Raphina exchange
Hey EA, I, aswell as many other users, were looking forward to exchanging Raphina for the 117 version, however it required a useless amount of 20, "115 ovr TOTY26 players". I get that it's going from a 115 Raphina to 117, however could you atleast reduce it to 10 or even 15, "115 ovr players" instead, to give users a chance to get him, please. Kind regardsDraft system - is there an end date?
Hey EA, Just wanted to know when do you think you will be loaded enough to scrap this crappy draft system. Would be good to know so that I can check back and see if something has moved with all the feedback you got on those lengthy threads. Cheers A football fan, not necessarily EAsSuggestion: Event-Based Visual & Momentum Upgrade (Balanced for FC Mobile)
I would like to share a feature suggestion focused specifically on enhancing Event Modes without affecting Ranked or H2H competitive balance. The idea is to introduce an event-based visual and momentum enhancement system that improves immersion, engagement, and overall excitement during limited-time live events while keeping core gameplay fairness intact. First, FC Mobile could introduce dynamic visual enhancements during special events. This may include reactive stadium lighting during clutch moments, enhanced crowd tifos and LED boards, themed weather conditions such as rain or night finals atmosphere, and improved cinematic goal replays. These upgrades would be purely visual and would not impact gameplay stats, but they would significantly increase emotional intensity and make events feel more premium and console-like. Second, a short-duration, skill-based “Momentum Surge” system could be introduced exclusively in event modes. For example, completing five perfect passes in a row, executing a clean defensive sequence, or launching a quick counter-attack within a few seconds of interception could trigger a brief 10–15 second boost. This boost could slightly enhance passing precision, provide a small sprint acceleration, or improve shot accuracy for one attempt only. These boosts would not be purchasable, would not stack, and would not be usable in Ranked modes, ensuring full competitive integrity. Additionally, monetization could focus on cosmetic enhancements rather than gameplay advantages. A premium event pass could unlock custom goal animations, visual player aura effects, themed stadium presentations, and special match intro cinematics. This approach would increase engagement and revenue without creating pay-to-win concerns. Finally, community-wide milestones could be introduced. For instance, if global players collectively score a certain number of goals during an event, all players could unlock temporary enhanced stadium visuals for 24 hours. This would encourage collaboration and increase overall participation in live events. This proposal aims to enhance immersion, increase event retention, and strengthen live event appeal while fully preserving the competitive foundation of FC Mobile. I would appreciate feedback from the community and team on whether something like this could be considered for future event development. Thank you for your time.Expanding the Legacy of Football Greats in FC Mobile"
Dear FC Mobile Team, I hope this message finds you well. I truly appreciate the continuous effort you put into improving FC Mobile and delivering exciting content for players around the world. I would love to see more legendary football icons introduced in future updates, including players such as David silva Deco Abu trika Mahmoud elkhatib Hassan shehata Mohamed barakat Edmilson Rummeneigge Van bronckhorst Saviola Yohan neeskens Dani Alves Edinson Cavani Raphaël Varane David Villa Arjen Robben Mesut Özil Robinho Romário Alfredo Di Stéfano Adding these iconic names would further enhance the game's legacy, excite long-time football fans, and bring even more depth and nostalgia to the overall experience. Thank you for your dedication and amazing work. Best regards, Medhat Shalaby
Ginga & Lunar New Year
Hey I completed all the challenges and claimed all the rewards in Ginga. Now what should I do? Just wait for it to end? And why are Ginga, Lunar New Year players not available for Extra Time Tokens exchange? Exchanging 10 players worth 20k ET Tokens for 1x draft voucher doesn't seem alright at all.TOTY Draft , F2P progression and Phase 2 tokens URGENT FEEDBACK
EA sports, your new draft system needs serious adjustments. It has a number of problems that make it feel impossible to progress in the game. Problem: Only after spending ludicrous amounts of gems do we get a decent player and this model isn't sustainable to build a team. Solution: Either make all the players tradeable or add the lower OVR players to the phase 2 tokens system so we get something out of each draft. Problem: The guaranteed pool, 10 drafts for a Pool B player isn't horrendous but still difficult. However 100 drafts to guarantee a pool A player is ridiculous. I would have to spend 300,000 gems to do so. Solution: Reduce the price for a draft voucher to 1,500 - 2,250 gems maximum and make it so we can get pool A players quicker such as 40 drafts. Or keep the gem price the same and give us a pool A player every 15 drafts guaranteeing a Pool A player after 45,000 gems. Problem: Removing other reward systems, we are no longer able to obtain rewards using universal tokens, league exchanges haven't had much to offer in a while, and other currencies are difficult to obtain. And all this happens as it becomes harder for us to use event tokens. Solution: reintroducing reward systems such as universal tokens, and making sure we can get decent rewards from them such as a few draft vouchers which aren't ridiculously priced. Reintroducing this and something more similar to the shard system or adjusting Phase 2 tokens to match the shard system may revive a large portion of the player base. These aren't all the problems but they are some of the biggest ones. Fixing these could help fix some of the underlying problems as well.Please
Dear Electronic Arts, I've been playing your game FC Mobile for quite some time now, and I really like it. But lately, you've been doing things that aren't really suitable for some players. For example, these Drafts—and, oh well, it wasn't in today's update that you added UTOTY cards. I was expecting Raphinha, but when I saw the conditions for him, I was very disappointed. I really want to keep playing this game, and I hope you'll listen to my feedback and at least change the trade conditions for Raphinha, my favorite player. Players need you. Sincerely, BarçaCulеrDimash _____ [Moved to English boards, as per forum rules. - CM]Lunar new year rewards
The rewards feel a bit stingy. Over the course of 7 days, I get two vouchers, a few rank-up points, a few gems, 4M coins and a bunch of bronze and silver cards. Why wouldn't it be five vouchers for example instead of two? the odds of the draft are low anyway but it's still a good thing to see a voucher as a final daily reward instead of bronze cards.Where is the justice ?
I spent thousands of gems and still couldn't get a high-level 117 GEN player.Where is justice? Other players are easily acquiring all the good players while I just watch. I'm fed up with this situation. Why do I need to play this game? Look at my account; I don't play as much as I used to. Because I'm tired of watching it. I'm tired of your customer service line calling it luck or random. You nerfed my account. Some players can easily get 117 GEN Ribery for 3,000 diamonds, while I can't get anyone for 130,000 diamonds. Is this fair?I'll be deleting this game soon, I hope you'll be happy with that.Rethink the EA SPORTS DRAFT system
The draft token system is a mess, and let me tell you why, it's just luck, you can put in $20,000, sell your house, put the money in FIFA, you still won't have a guarantee that you'll have a 117 ovr on your team. After 350 drafts, I don't have a 117, I didn't manage to collect 900 26 phase tokens and no 117 has been drawn, I can't even buy that only 6 tradable players dropped, which is right, out of the 6 I bought Raphinia 115 - 4 rank, I gave all the 115 players that dropped and I got myself a Raphinia of 117. The system needs to be redesigned, with guaranteed picks, so that everyone has 117 players, the discrimination is too great, it's frustrating that my opponents have from 4 players upwards of 117. It would be right for pool A not to mix 116 with 117, at 10 drafts guaranteed a 113, at 25 guaranteed a 114, at 50 guaranteed a 115 at 75 guaranteed a 116, and at 100 guaranteed a 117, this is how we eliminate frustration. Regarding 26 Phase tokens, 114 and 115 should not be of the same value as 113 - 5 tokens, 114 - 10 and 115 - 20. Rethink the EA SPORTS system, don't make fun of the community.
H2H matchmaking: Make it fair, make it fun
Just played a H2H match in which I was paired with an opponent more than 3 tiers above me (and with a +2 OVR compared to my squad). Why does the matchmaking algorithm think this is fair/fun? The insult to injury was that the guy was an obnoxious/toxic “red thumb” spammer (does reporting these poor sports actually do anything?). But the point is that I never should have been matched with this opponent in the first place! If the match was made purely for expediency (because there are fewer opponents available at the higher ranks), then I would rather wait a minute or two for someone at my level rather than to waste my time in a miserable match I have very little hope of winning (against a toxic opponent).Approved One-Time Grant Not Delivered
Hello, I am posting here after exhausting support channels regarding an approved one-time grant / recovery pack. In a previous support interaction, EA approved a one-time grant and instructed me to: -Create a new account -Link it to my EA Account -Provide the new User ID I completed all required steps. However, the grant was never delivered to the new account. Support has now closed the case, stating they cannot take further action, and that one-time grants cannot be re-issued. To be clear: I am NOT requesting account restoration. I am NOT requesting a second grant. I am requesting verification of whether the originally approved grant was actually delivered, and if so, on which account and on what date. If the case was marked as completed without the grant being delivered, this appears to be an administrative error. I respectfully request that a community manager review this matter. Thank you.
Community Highlights
- EA_Lanna10 months ago
Community Manager
- EA_Pulsar3 months ago
- EA_Pulsar8 months ago
- EA_Pythia10 months ago
Featured Places
EA SPORTS FC™ 26 Game Info Hub
Get all the information you need about EA SPORTS FC™ 26 here!FC Mobile
Playing EA SPORTS FC™ MOBILE? Talk about your experience on our community forums.FC Mobile Game Info Hub
Official updates and announcements for EA SPORTS FC™ MOBILE.FC Mobile General Discussion
Discuss all things game related on this EA SPORTS FC™ MOBILE community forum.FC Mobile Technical Issues
Trouble with EA SPORTS FC™ MOBILE? Issue with a crash, or error? Join this community to discuss troubleshooting.FC Mobile Bug Reports
Report bugs in EA SPORTS FC™ MOBILE and see what the community is saying on this forum.
