Forum Widgets
Featured Content
I was just banned in BF6
I was banned from bf6 I may be the first person to be banned. But I don't have anything showing on my penalty I don't cheat at all. I honestly don't understand why this happened. i downloaded data and it dont show anything about bf6 banSolvedTheMandalorKingT2 months agoSeasoned Scout33KViews83likes1374CommentsThe Portal XP Nerf and the Betrayal of "Full Progression" - Targeted Solutions
Hello everyone, I am extremely disappointed, and I know I'm not alone, with the decision to drastically reduce XP progression and unlocks on PVE Portal servers. This reversal, just days after launch, is a massive blow to the community and directly contradicts the promises made about the Portal feature. 1. The Broken Promise of "Full Progression" Portal was introduced as the ultimate sandbox, guaranteeing full progression regardless of the mode chosen. This was one of the biggest selling points for a large segment of the player base. The current implementation severely penalizes players who simply want to enjoy the PVE experience, learn new weapons, or progress at their own pace without the pressure of PVP. 2. The Nerf Solved Nothing and Punishes Honest Players The rush to "fix" XP farming has not resolved the underlying issue and has caused collateral damage: The Problem is the System, Not the Players: The initial XP farms were a predictable consequence of the tool. The fact that the server capacity issue is still prevalent shows that the XP nerf was a misguided attempt to mask a systemic infrastructure problem, not a solution to farming. Ineffective Measure: The XP farm servers are still over-capacity or have simply adapted to the new restrictions. Legitimate PVE players, however, are now left with a pointless grind. 3. This Drastic Nerf Will Kill Portal Ultimately, this broad nerf will do far more harm than good by killing the incentive to play the mode for the vast majority of users. Why would players spend time in Portal when their time spent is no longer respected by the progression system? Good community maps and genuinely fun PVE experiences will not be played under these conditions. Progression is the engine of engagement. By throttling it globally, you ensure that Portal, one of the game's key selling points, becomes a deserted ghost mode. Proposed Solutions: Restore Trust and Progression Instead of penalizing everyone, we urge the development team to adopt a multi-pronged approach that restores the promised progression for legitimate PVE play while seriously monitoring abuse. A. Restore Legitimate PVE Progression Re-enable Full XP on Official Game Modes: Progression (Full XP, Weapon Masters, Unlocks) must be fully restored for Portal experiences based on the official game types, even with AI bots filling the slots (i.e., Conquest, Rush, Breakthrough, Escalation, Team Deathmatch, FFA, and King of the Hill), in both Normal and Hardcore settings. Reinstate Solo/Co-op Mode: The dedicated Solo/Co-op vs. AI mode should be restored to Full Progression. This is the intended way for players to chill, learn the maps, and progress their unlocks without any impact on the live server environment. B. Target Abusers, Not the Community Serious Monitoring of Abusive Experiences: Implement active and immediate monitoring to identify and de-list or restrict XP only on custom servers that clearly use exploitative or non-conventional rule changes (e.g., 1-HP bots, instant respawns, AFK loop setups). Re-evaluate Unlock Requirements: Acknowledging the slow pace of unlocks, some Tier 1 requirements and attachments are currently an excessive "grind fest." Please take this opportunity to re-evaluate the requirements to make the core progression path less frustrating, reducing the incentive for players to seek out farming exploits in the first place. This community bought the game based on the promise of Portal's freedom and "full progression." We need you to deliver on that promise with targeted, effective solutions, not a blanket nerf that harms your loyal players. Thank you for your time and consideration.retrib2 months agoSeasoned Rookie15KViews345likes1070CommentsControversial Topic, but... Female Soldiers.
I'd like to start by saying I hope we can all be adults here while going through this topic. Two ideas can exist simultaneously, and those for me are that I have respect for women who serve or want to serve in frontline combat roles while at the same time I don't think they should. I believe that the capacity for violence and the burden put on those who commit it should be relegated to men. The ability to make war is a terrible yet necessary thing and when it comes down to it, men are simply more naturally inclined to be better at it and have a greater desire to do it. The entire basis of human nature is structured on men doing whatever is necessary to protect women and children. I obviously know that there are some who disagree with me here, but I also know that there are many who agree. There is also absolutely nothing misogynistic or sexist about these views, and it's okay to say that. People who hold this opinion don't believe any silly nonsense like "women are inferior" or anything like that, we simply believe that men and women are different and that's okay. So, why do I say all of this and why am I bringing up a topic that I know is going to be so controversial? I do it because I would like to ask Dice and EA to give us the ability to toggle female soldiers. I'm sorry if this offends some, but I'm sure some agree with me; I just don't want to play a war game with women in it. I don't want to hear women shouting as they're dying, I don't want to be firing at women, I just don't like it. I know there are women in combat roles in the modern age (though they are very few and far between), but it also still breaks the immersive experience to me. The most obviously egregious example of this was Battlefield V, and we all know how that controversy went. I hope that the world is in a more mature place to discuss something like this now and I feel like a toggle that gives everybody the option to play how they want isn't asking for too much. I'd also like to make it clear that I don't feel the same way about women in the military in general. I believe they definitely can excel in plenty of other roles such as in aviation, communication, command; it's just the frontline combat roles, which is what Battlefield is all about. And for my female gamers out there who enjoy these games, I think that's great and I want you to feel like you belong. These opinions have no relation to the idea of female gamers. Battlefield is a communal experience but at the same time is an individual experience for each of us who play. I know that after the madness of the last decade or so it's difficult to speak up on topics like this but I hope those who feel the same way aren't afraid to anymore. I know some would be offended and that we would get all of the articles from the "big" gaming outlets that no one cares about anymore but I hold out hope that with Dice and EA doing so much right on this game that maybe they'll have the guts to ignore the loud minority on something like this. I have full confidence that in the moment we're in a decision like this would not impact sales of a game that is shaping up to be so good. Even implementation after launch would be great. I hope that this is allowed to be posted here and that EA doesn't flag it as inappropriate or anything like that. For anyone who reads or engages with it, I appreciate your time.DomiPastrami4 months agoSeasoned Rookie8.7KViews180likes550CommentsSecurity Requirements on BF6 on PCs!
I'd like to know if the requirements shown in the photo are ALL mandatory in the new BF6, since, for example, in BF2042, only Secure Boot was required?! The requirements in BF6 are: TPM 2.0 Enable Secure Boot Enable HVCI Capable VBS CapableSolvedK9Port4 months agoNew Rookie6.7KViews5likes389Comments[UPDATE] Battlefield 6 Update: On Secure Boot & Cheats
Hey folks, AC from the SPEAR Anti-Cheat Team here, hope everyone's having fun in the Battlefield 6 Open Beta! I wanted to take a moment to acknowledge some of the feedback around cheating in the game, especially around Secure Boot. On Secure Boot, I want to be clear that Secure Boot is not, and was not intended to be a silver bullet. Secure Boot is how you're helping us build up our arsenal. It’s another barrier that helps us make it harder for cheat developers to create cheat programs, and makes it easier for us to detect it when they do. There are certain signals that we can only trust when Secure Boot is enabled, which we spoke of before in our previous posts, like here https://steamcommunity.com/app/2807960/discussions/0/600785827026563959/. One example, Secure Boot prevents your machine from running with vulnerable drivers enabled. So if Secure Boot is running and we see those drivers loaded, we know something's a bit off. I also wanted to thank you all for taking the time to report cheaters, cheat programs and specific clips to us. Your reports help us zero in and lead us to finding up and coming cheat communities, reporting one actual cheater often can lead to new detection techniques and help us keep them from impacting your experience. Since Open Beta Early Access’s launch: Javelin has prevented 330,000 attempts to cheat or tamper with anti-cheat controls. You’ve reported 44,000 instances of potential cheaters during day one and another 60,000 so far today. We are already using these with our own Gameplay Integrity team to add and improve our detections for Battlefield 6. They are also working with the Battlefield Positive Play team, to actively remove those reported we confirm to be cheaters. Anti-Cheat isn't one and done, it's an ever evolving battlefield, and what has worked for us previously or in different games doesn't always work in all of them. I hope this helps, and please keep the reports coming in - we'll continue cleaning up the cheaters so you can have a fair game. We’re looking forward to the Open Beta tomorrow, and if you need to, the best way to help combat cheaters in Battlefield 6 is by reporting them via their profiles on the score screen. See you on the Battlefield! - ACAntiCheatWard4 months agoEA Anticheat Team40KViews73likes314CommentsXbox Hard Crashing/Shutting Off While Playing BF6
Seems the xbox hard crash issue is still present in the full game, Any idea on what causes it / how to fix it? Its only on battlefield 6 i have this problem so im wary of a hardware issue but seems to be limited to said console Be half way through a game and it just flashes green and boom turn off CM title editthe2017legend2 months agoSeasoned Newcomer3.2KViews31likes193CommentsHardcore mode for veterans and those who prefer simulation
Hi DICE / EA team, I’ve been a Battlefield player since Bad Company 2 and I deeply value the tactical, immersive experience the franchise has always offered. Hardcore mode—with reduced HUD, one-shot kills, friendly fire, no minimap—was an iconic part of Battlefield’s identity. It’s disappointing that in Battlefield 6 Hardcore is only available through Portal, requiring custom servers and manual setup. Many long-time fans (including myself) just want to queue into a standard Hardcore playlist via matchmaking, like in BF3 and BF4. A simple option at the start of matchmaking—"Standard" vs "Hardcore"—would let new players join the normal mode, while veterans could select what they know and love. This choice doesn’t harm anyone and addresses both audiences fairly. Portal cannot replace matchmaking: lack XP progression, and aren’t easily discoverable. Access to Hardcore via matchmaking would revitalize competitive play and honor Battlefield’s legacy. Please consider adding an official Hardcore playlist to standard matchmaking. Many fans have voiced similar concerns and would greatly appreciate such a feature. Thank you for listening.spectro9754 months agoSeasoned Rookie12KViews248likes117CommentsGive spawn beacon back to recon?
I feel like "assault" didnt really have a important function because its based on just getting kills and pushing forward which arguably any class can do, just without the extra weapon and stims. So they gave assault a function fron recon to keep pushing forward but now I barely see people use it, or if its used its done really poorly. I dont see whats wrong with the original Engineer (Vehicles), Medic (health/revives), Support (ammo/suppression) and Recon (intel/harrassment). Ive also had the same ick when they made support the medic. Like why is my medic laying down suppressive fire with an LMG?! Whys doc gotta carry all the meds AND ammo? Medics should be proficient in carbines or smg's no? Or would that make them too powerful. Im sure this all falls to some balancing reason but what do you think?1.3KViews45likes116CommentsDisappointed by Battlefield 6’s Lack of Linux Support
To whom it may concern, I was genuinely excited about Battlefield 6. The trailers, the gameplay previews—all of it looked amazing. But that excitement was instantly deflated when I realized there’s no support for Linux at all! I’m running Ubuntu LTS and have absolutely no interest in switching back to Windows just to play EA games. It’s frustrating, to say the least, that in 2025 we’re still dealing with such narrow platform support. Linux users are no longer a fringe group—we’re passionate, loyal, and growing. Ignoring us feels like a slap in the face. I won’t be buying Battlefield 6 unless Linux support is taken seriously. Simple as that. Please rethink this decision—not just for me, but for the entire Linux community. Regards, A very disappointed gamerNever_Go_Jose4 months agoSeasoned Novice13KViews110likes111CommentsPortal Server Visibility/Matchmaking Issue (low player count regions)
Edit: Matchmaking (via the multiplayer tab) is currently horrendous in low player count regions. Players are scattered across different games/disbanded after a game ends. This often results in players being thrown into empty lobbies which are populated mostly by bots. This is especially an issue in regions that have a relatively low number of players. Portal is NOT a good alternative because the Portal servers have a much lower tickrate (30 Hz). Also, not all servers hosted on Portal are visible on the Portal server browser, and understandably so, because the browser would otherwise be cluttered. The problem is that players on South African servers struggle to find portal games because there is no option to select Africa as a search region. Please fix the portal visibility issue and the matchmaking. Edit 2: There are enough players in the low player count regions for full games. It's just that the current matchmaking algorithm is unnecessarily splitting those players into multiple games Dice plzzzSolved2.5KViews71likes101CommentsBring bots back to portal
Someone decided it was a good idea to remove bots from the portal verified modes :-( please remove to reduce the XP. As a guy who does not play BF6 all day, everyday, I don't get much fun from playing online against these hardcore players. Neither do my friends :-( we would love to see bots be put back! there are also non hardcore player ;-) don't forget us please!Riff666Master31 days agoSeasoned Rookie2.8KViews91likes97CommentsBf6 is not Battlefield anymore
Yesterday after once again the game was infested with cheaters i decided to launch Bf2042 and BfV, it blew my mind what a huge difference Bf6 is compared to the other Bf's, there's simply no comparison anymore, Bf6 has diminished itself to a fast paced no brain sweat lord online shooter wrapped in Bf skins. I really encourage everyone to launch a previous Bf, you'll be amazed how Bf6 doesn't even come close, and how peaceful you'll feel !! (it's weird how fast i forgot the difference) They fooled us all with their nice graphics but honestly after now playing the game for about 120 hours it feels boring, the maps are way to small and way to fast paced. It just feels repetitive and there's nothing appealing to stay, the speed ruins everything! It's become nothing more than a brainless shooter. This game is nothing more than a cortisol releaser on steroids and imo very unhealthy for mental health. It's nothing but frustration after frustration, to the point this can't be coincidence anymore. I think we can officially say the once awesome and fun Battlefield franchise is over. I'm going back to the previous ones, at least there i won't have to deal with the never ending bs they release on us and i'll be playing Bf6 like once every two months, if i even remember the game. There's nothing to gain in this game, it's just a big waste of time, it's a content creator farm. And the fact they killed Portal by removing the bots, the fact we get zero progression compared to what was advertised they clearly don't want us to chill & relax and play what WE want, i had it with these corporations taking away things, because the only reason for this is they are simply manipulating everyone to play what they say we have to play. They want power over you, that's why they don't rent out servers, they'll have to give away their power as you'll have the ability to moderate your server, they don't want that! You are not seen as a community, you are seen as consumers. See you on the other side, GG'sIamSharkx28 days agoRising Ace3.2KViews61likes84CommentsOpen vs locked weapons per class
Traditionally Battlefield has always been about classes, and with that came class locked weapons. This how it was and how it should be! One of the big mistakes they made with BF2042 was to first introduce specialists, and next they gave these specialists access to ALL weapons. Later on they partially fixed the issue by implementing back the class system, however weapons remained open. With the open beta we have a chance to make our voices being heard! As I'm sure they will be monitoring traffic towards what people want to play, let's make our actions speak louder than our words by all ignoring the Conquest mode and pick Closed Weapon Conquest instead. And from there I hope the message will be clear to the developers that we need closed weapons in ALL game modes!Solved6.3KViews25likes83Comments(12-11-2025) - EA/Dice, i Listed Fixes/Nerfs/improvments
***(Changes update 26/10/2025) Promote subject guys for better and more enjoyable gameplay in the future💙 Hey Dice Please fix or slightly nerf the current 0.005% bullet drop feeling. Right now the ballistic physics in Battlefield 6 feel almost completely flat — and that takes away a huge part of what made sniping in Battlefield 4 so satisfying. In BF4, every headshot felt like an achievement. You had to calculate range, bullet drop, and timing — it gave you that true “sniper” feeling, that rush when you nailed a long-range shot after judging distance and elevation just right. It wasn’t just aiming — it was skill. Now in BF6, it feels like you just aim directly at the head, even from far away, and you get an instant kill. There’s almost no need to think, to compensate, to feel that learning curve that made Battlefield sniping so special. All I’m asking for is a small adjustment — a touch more bullet drop or travel time. Not a full rework, just enough to bring back that sense of mastery and reward that the Battlefield community loved so much in BF4. Because right now, it’s just not as fun as it used to be — and that satisfaction of hitting a real calculated headshot is missing. Add — The Opportunity to cancel the slide, its causing the player to keep sliding into a danger zone and end up dying. **Fix — Mini map is too tiny even on "large" size. **Fix — The wrong hand placment on foregrip when adding lasers on top of the rails. **Fix — The position of the smg's/Snipers/etc.. is not centered on screen when running. (The weapons is located a little to the left) **Fix — The game needs to be optimized cause the Gameplay performance is very bad the game is on very low and its stutering and thers very low fps even on rtx4070ti. (high spec pc etc.. **Fix — Remove the 100-point attachment limit for weapons. Instead, allow players to equip as many attachments as they want, but make each one come with stronger pros and cons. This way, customization can be more creative without breaking balance18KViews54likes81CommentsDear EA/DICE: You’re Losing the Battlefield Community
Dear Developers, I want to start by saying that I honestly wish I didn’t have to write this post. I’m writing this as someone who’s genuinely sad and frustrated. It’s obvious that EA wanted to attract CoD players — and at first, I completely understood that and had no problem with it. My first impressions from the Beta were great, I was truly hyped, pre-ordered the Phantom Edition, and couldn’t wait for October 10th. Today I’m level 110, and I think it’s finally time to share my thoughts. I’ve been playing Battlefield for around 15 years, and my favorite will always be BF2 (RIP GameSpy). Well… we definitely got a product aimed at CoD players — but in the worst possible way. The TTK and TTD are absolutely miserable, the 4-player party limit is a joke, forced operator choices feel out of place, and there’s NO SERVER BROWSER! How can the lead producer say we don’t need one? I honestly thought it was a joke at first — and that the community feedback would be heard — but nothing ever happened. Matchmaking is a disaster. Every second match I play is completely unbalanced. There’s no option to pick the attacking or defending side without disconnecting and reconnecting a dozen times until it finally puts me where I want to be. This problem used to be handled by server admins through the browser — they helped keep matches fair and balanced. And don’t even get me started on the challenges. They’re an absolute pain to complete. I honestly don’t know if they were designed by an AI or by someone who’s never actually played the game, but they’re a complete tragedy. The overall pace of the game is way too fast, leaving almost no time for proper teamplay, even when you actually try to play tactically with friends. The gameplay experience feels on par with BF2042 — but ironically, that game still had more freedom. I honestly get the feeling that the developers haven’t played this game for more than 20 minutes… or worse, that this is intentional — which would be really sad and could bury the entire franchise. What also really disappoints me is the complete lack of developer feedback here on the forums. I understand you can’t respond to every single post, but it would be basic respect to at least address some of the hot topics here. Right now the community feels unheard, like our frustration just keeps piling up and EA leadership simply doesn’t care. Maps, maps, maps… This topic has already been brought up several times — and yeah, I wouldn’t say the maps are terrible, but they are really, really small and focused entirely on running and shooting with no sense of tactics whatsoever. As for the bugs, I’m still patient for now. We’re only in the first season, and I know updates will come — bugs happen in every game at launch. That said, I did expect a bit more polish for a 100€ title, but I can still understand it… for now. To end on a more positive note — the graphics are absolutely beautiful. I just wish we could enjoy this amazing world with more freedom, playing the way players want to play, not the way we’re being forced to. Please, developers — take a little time to listen to what players here on the forums are saying and what’s frustrating them. Otherwise, this could genuinely bury the whole franchise. Thank you for your time.AcidryzeN23 days agoSeasoned Ace2KViews72likes78CommentsTTK&TTD| It’s hard to kill a soidler
Hello @EA @DICE. I am writing about this for the second time. Not only am I writing about this, but many players are — mostly veteran players have focused on this issue. Killing a person is very difficult. The system for killing a person is very similar to Call of Duty’s kill system. It takes a lot of bullets to kill a person — that’s exactly how it is in Call of Duty. @EA @DICE I understand you want to attract COD players, but I don’t think deviating from Battlefield’s traditions for that reason is necessary. The game is clearly becoming similar to Call of Duty. The biggest problem is the difficulty of killing a soldier. I am a veteran player and I feel that when I shoot a soldier, something is not right. When I shoot a soldier, I feel like I’m shooting an armored tank. It takes far too many bullets to kill a soldier. Most of the time I have to empty a whole magazine to kill one soldier. Please bring back a realistic kill system to the game. A single headshot should naturally be enough to kill, which already exists, but a body hit should kill a soldier with at least 2–4 bullets. New players or COD players do not notice this problem. We, Battlefield veterans, feel and notice this problem — we “veterans” have a lot of experience and we know what we are saying: killing a person is unrealistically difficult. I think the official TTK & TTD of the game should be fast. When you shoot a soldier he should drop/ die as he would die in a real war. Please consider this. If you do not do this, then at least create an official Hardcore Mode and put it in the main menu. This Hardcore Mode should be identical to Conquest except for one change — killing a person should be easy/realistic. Thank you in advance.TheRock199992 months agoSeasoned Veteran1KViews19likes72CommentsBring back C4 to Support
I've been playing Support ever since BF3 and I've always ran C4 with the resupply box. This is the first Battlefield where I was forced to switch to Recon with an LMG in order to get C4. Not only does this mean I run out of bullets incredibly quick, Recons gadgets aren't nearly as interesting as Supports, especially considering spawn beacon was removed from Recon. There is an easy fix though. Just bring C4 to Support again, and possibly also to Assault. The is no logical reason to have it locked to Recon. Important to note is that I don't want to remove it from Recon. It could exist for multiple roles just as in BF4. This also begs for an even greater question. Why even lock C4 to classes in the first place? It still requires you to swap out a key gadget and I don't see a single class that wouldn't benefit from having that option. Thanks for reading!jabbathefrukt2 months agoRising Adventurer763Views28likes69CommentsPC Ability to turn off crossplay with consoles
I am pretty irritated that Dice isnt forcing console players to play with pc if they dont want to. But they are forcing pc to play with console even if we dont want to. What is with the catering to consoles but not your original fan base on pc. You guys have given too much ASsistance to console players trying to balance controller and quite honestly im fed up with it. We dont care that they cant match our precision its not our fault that controller cant reproduce precision. Giving them less recoil bullet magnetism aim assist all stacked on top of each other is doing too much. Getting really tired of dying to a controller player while head camping bc ofthe combination of all these things together just gives them an advantage that as a pc player I just cant engage them in certain scanarios and win they have too much assistance going on under the hood. They just hold down the trigger on any gun and get If you want to give them that much of a handicap fine but give pc players the ability to turn off crossplay. It should never be forced on anyone period if they dont want it on. Makes no sense why you give console the option but not pc. I want to be able to have the option of just playing with pc players.yungluke2222 months agoRising Scout7.5KViews88likes68CommentsBattlefield 6 Bot removal Protest
Ladies and gentlemen in the Battlefield 6 production team and in the community itself, I am a 50 year old man who has bought BF6 for 70 euros after considering and talking about it with my oldest son. The reason I bought BF6 was because, old and hard working as I am, never being able to compete with all the experienced and extremely fast young people out there, there is the option to play against bots. I was having so much fun and was so pleased playing all the modes and upgrading on my own (slowly and handicapped because of my age and decreasing eyesight). I bet there are many, many people out there that have the same condition as me, or worse and are also, like myself, very disappointed and feeling robbed of their money by this just ridiculous and antisocial action. The game has been ruined totally for me! I recommend everybody, also people who dont play against bots to file in an error report in the ea app or through steam. Update Error:Bring back the bots! Standalone, upgrading outside of human vs human multiplayer. This "update" is antisocial towards the community, I have no other word for it. I feel robbed of my 70 euros, cant even ask for a refund. Antisocial!WCP752 months agoSeasoned Adventurer2.2KViews85likes65Comments
Community Highlights
- EA_Rtas2 months ago
Community Manager
- EA_Rtas5 months ago
Community Manager
Featured Places
Battlefield Game Info Hub
Read the latest news and announcements from the Battlefield Team.Battlefield 6
Discuss the latest news and game information around Battlefield 6 in the community forums.Battlefield 6 General Discussion
Join the Battlefield 6 community to get game information and updates, talk tactics and share Battlefield moments.Battlefield 6 Technical Issues
Having issues with Battlefield 6? Join here to find help with connectivity, performance issues, crashes and more.Battlefield 6 Bug Reports
Report bugs and see what the Battlefield 6 community is saying on this forum.